kwertyops
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
version: '3'
services:
ollama:
image: ollama/ollama
container_name: ollama
ports:
- "11434:11434"
volumes:
- ollama-volume:/root/.ollamaBut I wonder if this is a sign of things to come - rather than needing to find explicit deterministic solutions to many problems that might actually have one, because ML is getting much more powerful and accessible instead we'll just use ML models and get 99.9% accurate solutions, but say, well that's good enough.
~/me $_ x = files('Music')
~/me $_ for item in x:
> if 'Rick Astley' not in x['name']:
> delete(x['path'])
Shouldn’t that be: ~/me $_ x = files('Music')
~/me $_ for item in x:
> if 'Rick Astley' not in item['name']:
> delete(item['path'])
?I always thought the process was tedious but systematic enough to automate, and to some extent I think I was right. Here’s a video of one of the arrangements: https://youtu.be/F3h_yQOM_Jg
If tulips bulbs were of a limited supply, (relatively) infinitely divisible, (relatively) impossible to forge, and could be transferred anywhere in the world, in any amount, (relatively) instantaneously… Would it really be that crazy to imagine that they may have kept significantly more value? Or be used as a kind of currency?
It seems like anything with those properties could be a good basis for a currency, whether it’s Beanie Babies or Pokémon cards (neither of which actually do have those properties), or cryptographically secure blocks of teleporting cheese.
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_potentiation