krainboltgreene

The conditions for DeepSeek's profitability are very very narrow. A key piece being that they have cheap energy, a second key is that they have west/east clients and thus extremely high uptime.

It's so funny watching tech workers spout propaganda about the Luddites.

Brother, they're you. You just don't realize it yet.

> And also that on the other side of that grief is something new and potentially exciting, but very different than what we're all used to.

We had our work stolen and they're squeezing us with it, all for garbage, what in the world are you talking about.

Don't forget that, in my opinion very positive way, it also normalized the concept of "uniform measurements". Every instance of `rounded-md` is the same on a site.

I feel like that's exactly what's happened.

You haven't actually refuted their premise.

Yeah, real wild.

I do however like the imagery from the parent of a big collection of people working for a decade to produce one (1) drug and then burning all that infrastructure and training down and then being shocked when someone with no infrastructure or training or history in drugs comes along and somehow produces it but outsells the original.

I'm saying that most people, even most programmers, don't have the facilities or inclination to train new models man. I've done it plenty of times and I absolutely don't recommend it.

Frankly I don't think you even know what the phrase entails.

> AI can be trained.

I don't have access to a data center's worth of GPUs, unfortunately. You offering yours?

Probably because a human authored contribution, no matter how bad, can be trained to make it good and also improves the community.

What question do you think you're answering?

Leaded gasoline.

This is such a strange attitude to have. How can you look at the history of the world and be so caustic to concern?

You guys can’t help but lie, lmao.