kongqiu

Joined 16 years ago

Karma
422
Submissions
172
Member since
Nov 3
Founder of ParkGrades.com
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 15 years ago
Taklamakan Desert. Looks like they're mining something...
Comment · 15 years ago
Your conclusion is well-founded. The micro side of economics is one part science and one part logic; the macro side is one part logic and one part hand-waving.
Comment · 15 years ago
It's a judgment call. And many, many of the free market-loving, pro-innovation people on HN judge partnering with Monsanto (and bragging about it) to be the wrong move.

The world is dirty, and there's no perfect company (or perfect people), but most people have red lines some place that they will not cross. Monsanto lies on the far side of the line for many.

Comment · 15 years ago
Monsanto is an extreme case, and therefore inspires a lot of passion. I'd say the vast majority of people on HN are pro-capitalism and pro-innovation, but have disparate views on business ethics and the efficacy of various regulations. In the eyes of many, Monsanto crosses the line between "good honest competition" and "dangerous and malevolent would-be monopolist."

Also: Way to paint people you disagree with on this issue as "very anti-capitalist, anti-innovation, pro-taxes..."

Comment · 15 years ago
There's a place in civilized, rational discussion for ranting.

Let's say you're out with two friends discussing the war on drugs, with all kinds of rational, civilized debate on the science, politics, economics, sociology, etc. Suddenly, one friend declares, "Ok, I understand the risks and potential rewards, and I've decided to start dealing coke." Sure, you can try to calmly talk them out of it, and/or you could do some "ranting." Both would be appropriate.

"Hivemind" indeed.

Comment · 15 years ago
It's an unfortunate sign for everyone that you (and/or Cloudant) wouldn't anticipate this reaction from going into business with Monsanto.

As to the "content-free" claim, sometimes a rant is an appropriate reaction. If some YC company partnered with Al Qaida, would we really need to spell out all the heinous things AQ has done before writing, "F- that!"?!?

EDIT: And to your "If the rule is, if x sells something to Monsanto, fuck x, then what you're saying is fuck the entire corporate world, because I'm sure Monsanto buys Apple computers and Chevrolets and Clorox too. It's sort of ridiculous to hold Cloudant to a standard that essentially zero other companies meet."

-- It's one thing if Monsanto buys iPhones and Macs from Apple; that would represent ~.0001% of Apple's overall business. It's another thing if Monsanto is responsible for a significant % of your revenue.

(Of course, Cloudant's deal with Monsanto could represent only 2% of Cloudant's total revenue; but since it's a startup, the initial reaction people will have is that it's significantly higher than that.)

Comment · 15 years ago
This raises a real dilemma: at what point does a company or organization cross the line from "not my cup of tea" to "ethically ambiguous" to "pure evil"?

What if Cloudant were to power analytics for Trader Joe's?

Goldman Sachs?

Halliburton?

The Sinaloa Cartel?

Certainly there's a line...

Comment · 15 years ago
Wow. I might actually buy this magazine from a newsstand. Way to differentiate!
Comment · 15 years ago
Any specifics as to the content or genre of the movie? (Many companies wouldn't want to be associated with certain kinds of content.)

How large (as % of the billboard) are the picture, logo, or text?

Comment · 15 years ago
DuckDuckGo! I'd say the search results are better/less cluttered about 60% of the time, and google or bing are only a !bang away...
Comment · 15 years ago
Sometimes I think every child that's born should receive not only a Social Security Number, but a trust, a holding corporation, and a political action committee in his/her name.

The political and legal playing field has always been tilted in one way or another, but it keeps getting more and more extreme.

Comment · 15 years ago
Basically, it's:

1. Go to the "Profile Matches" offer tab

2. View source; the users' ids are right there

3. Look up those users' profiles directly (e.g., /profile/view?id=xyxyxyxy

Comment · 15 years ago
Play is so important, but since it's difficult to measure the value, it gets down-played as "non-productive." While it's obvious when someone is "over-playing," it's just as important to identify when you're "under-playing"...

Some of my biggest breakthroughs on work-related projects have come to me as I've been hiking, taking in a museum with my wife, or pushing my daughter on a swingset.

Comment · 15 years ago
Exactly. This would intimidate my aunt; Hipmunk would amaze her.
Comment · 15 years ago
Any legal way to hack this by, say, something along the lines of "Glassdoor for founders/VCs/etc."?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton