knaekhoved

> and are also one of the ones that can be changed later

Frankensteinian surgical mutilation is not really "changing genitals".

In excess of 99.98% of people have the genitals naively predicted by their chromosomes.

This is one of the closest-to-perfectly-binary phenomena that exists in nature.

A family member is. And no, I'm not.

Language ought to "cleave reality at the joints" - i.e. approximate an information-theoretically optimal encoding.

If you start screwing over the 99.9%ile case to slightly improve the remaining 0.1%, you are not approximating an optimal encoding.

Stop using intersex people (who have extremely rare physiological diseases) as a political tool to justify transsexual ideology, when >99% of transsexuals do not have any such disease.

Your example contradicts the claim. They say "assigned male at birth" rather than "male", because they believe you can be a female even if you were assigned male at birth.

Hiding comments from 99.5% of users is functionally the same as deleting them.

The EU can certainly claim any absurd jurisdiction they like, but how are they planning to enforce this? Ultimately it seems the primary thing they can do is censor Discord from EU internet.