kleiba
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
It's most definitely baloney because I also had to provide ID. So, certainly there is no way I could identify myself "even more" by giving them a phone number than by giving them a government issued ID.
But this might not really have been a 2FA case - I mean, I was physically sitting in the bank.
His jaw dropped half-way through when he asked for my wife's and my phone number, and I had to tell him that I don't own a smart phone.
Turns out you must have a smart phone because the system sends you some kind of code to verify your identity. Let that sink in: I am sitting in front of the clerk, but in order to identify me, he needs me to give him some phone number.
The only way we could finalize the application is by me asking my mother whether I could use her phone number briefly to get this over with. She forwared the code to my wife's phone. That worked in the end -- but so much for "identifying me".
I didn't follow up what became of her startup idea, but there's no way she could have ever gotten it off the ground in just two months, like the guy from the article and his brother. More like two years...
| You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License.
Also, the thought that we as a married couple are not an entity is strange to me, but I guess that's the modern way of thinking, and I am old.