kkapelon

what are the differences between domux and herdr ?

As a counterpoint, I use herdr in WSL/windows and has never crashed for me.

herdr (supercharged tmux) has also mouse keybindings. So instead of remembering how to split a pane, you just right click with the mouse and choose "split" from the popup menu

> If you aren't familiar with tmux(or GNU screen), you owe it to yourself to become familiar

Or just jump straight into herdr which offers a superset of what tmux offers.

This is essentially an ad for crystl.

I haven't check the whole list of features, but I believe herdr can do all the things described in the article (including what tmux offers)

I have a TPlink omada system that works exactly the same. Managed controller and APs that get adopted.

I bought them brand new from shops. No distributor, no enterprise sales.

I believe Aruba works in a similar way

yes you understand correctly. The assumption is that you already have Tailscale for remote access and you get taildrop "for free". Installing tailscale just to get file sharing doesn't make sense if FlipFlop already does it and that is the only thing you need.

Tailscale is super popular with people that have a homelab or nas/cameras/photos etc, and they have already solved the NAT problem (which iroh itself markets).

The Readme literally says "Use it to share stuff between all your devices".

I would argue that Tailnet is a good match for this.

Maybe expand the readme to cover other use cases interesting to existing Tailscale users?

It is two completely different things

1. The co-ordination server for the initial handoff. You can self-host if you want

2. Derp relays (for actual traffic). you can also self-host (peer relays)

Actually if self-hosting is that important to you, there are also newer solutions like netbird and netmaker that might worth a look.

> which relies on a central server and someone who "owns" that network

Tailscale connections are peer-to-peer. They only own the coordination server, which you can ignore and host your own.

> which is typically hosted by Tailscale

Tailscale hosts relay servers as a fallback. Connections are peer-to-peer between devices.

> The great thing about Ubiquiti APs for me is that each new WiFi generation (or two) I can just buy a few more, snap the existing APs off of the various ceilings they're attached to, snap on the new ones, adopt them, and away we go

Why is this exclusive to Ubiquiti? Can't you do it with any other company that has managed APs?

They release new models and completely abandon the old ones. You are happy now. Have you asked owners of Flint 1 (or other older models), how they feel now?