kingsuper20

Being nit-picky, there's no such thing as a Nobel Prize for economics.

> No politician could possibly admit it, but geopolitically, temperate climate countries are going to be net beneficiaries and will need to protect themselves from tropical and sub tropical countries.

In the case of Europe and Africa, I'd say that the main pressure will simply be one of demographics more than weather.

> Wait I thought outlier weather events like blizzards and heat waves weren't indicators of global climate as the media so likes to lecture about when it's not in favor of their narrative.

It's probably fair to hold two ideas at the same time.

. Climate change is a way to accumulate rank and wealth in society.

. Climate change is real

It's interesting to ask what everyone is really after in terms of climate. Lack of change or natural events occurring. Would an upcoming ice age result in a cry for more CO2?

I like to think of it in terms of carrying capacity. Too many people results in environmental degradation (of all sorts), social unrest, scrabbling at the bottom for wages, squabbling at the top for status.

> In my experience, SMBs don't hire expensive software engineers.

I've definitely seen that at the 'S' end of the scale.

Programmers who have been there for years, often with no formal education, the codebase looks like them. They tend to be stuck in those jobs.

It's weird that urgent care clinics aren't parked right next to the ER and that the urgent care clinics aren't 24x7.

No doubt this occurs sometimes but I've never seen it.

Anecdata. My wife says that most people at the ER don't need an ER. Of course they serve as a primary healthcare for the homeless.

>Developers who are entrenched enjoy the fact it is hard to get a permit.

Imagine how much a developer with Coastal Commission expertise could charge. That's probably a specialty in itself.

>Copyright doesn't just benefit huge corporations. For instance, without it, independent artists who rely on copying for distribution (authors, musicians, etc.) would find it much more difficult to make money off their work,

That doesn't look like it's the point to me.

""[the United States Congress shall have power] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right , to their respective Writings and Discoveries." "

As I read that, copyright is there to 'promote progress', not to maximize gains.

No doubt there is a million linear feet of case law that got us where we are.

Honestly, I rather like this whole question of copilot. I solidly appreciate the brilliance of github as a honeypot.

Personally, I think that voting is ridiculous, but I see the point.

It's one of the strongest methodologies for making a discussion board addictive.

I think an interesting feature to add would be to have peoples' user areas show how many downvotes they have spewed forth.

The amount of gray posts in censorship threads always cracks me up.

Please go on.

It could be that part of the problem is that you only see their public persona. Start adding all the weasel words to imply that you think that something is 73% likely to be mostly true and you lose an audience

Everyone (well, most everyone) could stand to examine their own problems (well, issues) with stating opinions as fact.