kfury

Joined 18 years ago

Karma
349
Submissions
79
Member since
Mar 26
Former Mozillan, Facebooker, Friendfeeder, Googler, Yahooligan, CMU HCII masters grad, Berkeley Cognitive Science grad.

I like to design stuff.

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 12 years ago
Thanks!
Comment · 13 years ago
The real Bender's eyes have square pupils.
Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
It's spinning in the right direction if you're a satellite in a mid-altitude equatorial orbit.
Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
The Kepler analysis team has only gone through the first two years worth of data.

There are still two more years worth of exoplanets for us.

Comment · 13 years ago
Some Ekranoplans (like the Lun mentioned in the article) have the ability to fly above the ground effect zone, though less efficiently.

If rogue waves (or other rough sea) can be spotted far enough ahead, the plane could increase altitude over brief rough spots, settling back on to its ground effect cushion once calmer waters were reached.

Because it's travelling so much faster than surface waves, the lidar (or whatever scanning system) would only have to consider a relatively narrow field of view in front of the craft.

Comment · 13 years ago
Thank you! Wow, on a Retina display this looks just amazing.
Comment · 13 years ago
These seem to be very low resolution (~500px). Are there high resolutions available? I tried finding one for Van Gogh's 'Irises' and couldn't.
Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
A launch is completely different from a private short-range test on a closed site.

You could watch a launch live, and they are very public about the timing, purpose, and location of launches before they happen.

The Grasshopper tests (to my knowledge) are not open for public observation, and I haven't seen any media coverage prior to tests, so if there was an unsuccessful test it wouldn't be as obvious as an unsuccessful launch attempt.

My question was whether this is by design, and if there was an unsuccessful test whether they would showcase that as well, in the manner that unsuccessful launches are well documented public 'learning experiences'.

Comment · 13 years ago
Does SpaceX document all their tests publicly? Or are we just seeing the successful ones? (If they've all been successful ones, will we see unsuccessful ones if they come in the future?)
Comment · 13 years ago
The spellchecker doesn't actually kick in all that often. The better solution is to give flags back differentiating between 'unlikely' and 'impossible' email addresses.
Comment · 13 years ago
Oh the edge cases will be so angry. There are a very few engineers at Google who have Gmail account names shorter than 6 characters. It's not the norm, but they exist. Their addresses can't be validated.

I'm sure there are special cases all over the place. It would be nice if Mailgun differentiated between 'this address is just malformed' and 'from what I know of [ISP], this address oughtn't exist'.

Comment · 13 years ago
People have waited through so many failed attempts to record the drop that nobody wants to mention that they didn't 'really' record an unassisted drop. The bead is still connected when it hits bottom, and the tail doesn't break until they raised up the suspended platform.

Check the video and notice that the suspended vessel jumps about 2 inches higher just after the drop.

It's a good recording, but I'm looking forward to a better one in 2026.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton