kevlened

Agreed. Morphogenesis is more general. Limb regeneration is how morphogenesis is represented in this problem set.

That’s number 6: limb regeneration.

Without humans, you could rediscover any benefit the "human search method" confers with enough compute and time, but we're limited by both.

When a search space has irreducible complexity, ensemble search methods can improve performance. It's possible culture, emotions, religion, etc are part of an ensemble.

Simulating the "human search method" in silico doesn't need to include specific personalities, but they do provide a bootstrap, just as we've bootstrapped current AI with human language.

For symbiosis, there may be an advantage to the physical adaptability of biology.

In general, it's currently unclear if biology is emulating what we're creating in computers, if computers are emulating what we achieve biologically, or if both approaches are imperfect emulations of a different ideal search method.

That's quite a complement to AI

It can be airborne, lives on sanitized surfaces for up to 10 weeks, and may take 3 years for symptoms to appear.

Still, it is more concerning for cats than humans.

One argument may be that ownership is the last role for a human in a business. The firm exists to show ownership of an AI and provides a mechanism for managing its proceeds.

Nanoclaw uses the official claude agent sdk, so it should be unaffected.

> A recent study from Stanford

Source?

Even without prior knowledge, seeing others safely navigate the same section will lower your estimated risk.