kevinstubbs
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
8 hours is specific, a day is ambiguous. See Chinese 996 for example.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/02/1102596510/turkey-changes-nam...
So if you assume that you start on google.com, then your options are like 1.) Input with name "search", placeholder "search anything", value "" 2.) Button with label "I'm feeling lucky" 3.) Button with label "search"
Obviously, doing just one of these doesn't achieve the objective - it just needs to pick which one it thinks has the most "value" for completing the objective. If you repeat that enough times, then it can actually do what your overall goal of the session was.
I'm just giving a simplistic answer, and if you implemented only what I've written, then it's going to get stuck in a loop more often than not. But that's the gist of how you could encode the DOM into something that GPT can interpret and make decisions/take actions based on.
Yes, if you encode the DOM as a list of options for ChatGPT to choose from. In fact I developed a proof of concept of this for a client. https://jarvys.ai/ although they seem to have pivoted from automating just the browser to automating all software.
Answering your questions - Will be this the situation for most tech companies or just start ups I expect companies that are still looking for PMF using VC money to die. This is essentially a population bottleneck (1) for certain classes of companies (pre-revenue) & verticals (crypto).
- during recessions recruiting slows down even for big profitable companies[?] The job market overheated for companies doing traditional sourcing, salaries were bumped across the whole industry to retain people, and still a lot of people left. I am sure that some companies overcompensated for this and are going to be burned if last year they went overboard with hiring & retention and this year the market blows up. I don't have an inkling as to which companies to watch out for, but some have already announced layoffs.
- What companies or roles will be more resilient? Companies - big blue chip ones are always safe and look good on a resume. Microsoft, Google, Apple, etc. aren't going anywhere. Even if you join Meta and get laid off due to their bad VR strategy.. it still helps your career by having joined them in the first place. Roles? Anything that existed a couple years ago is fine. Anything brand new like "head of remote work" I wouldn't be so confident about.
- And how as a SWE / tech industry professional, specially the ones starting their careers like me, can prepare? Just keep interviewing at companies with established engineering teams. Don't go somewhere with just 1 or 2 developers, or where engineering isn't the core of their business. This is where good talent goes to languish. I've seen too many people come out of these companies with years of "experience" but it was learned in isolation without somebody experienced helping to shape them into a real middle of senior developer; The worst thing you can do is rack up the years without the actual substance. It's like not MSFT or others are tough - it's just everybody you work with will teach you something new that it's unavoidable. In a tiny company you have to figure out everything by yourself or follow trends, which are less than ideal.
- Is demoralizing to find out I spent 4 years in school just to get into a really harsh job market You are entering almost the best market ever for developers. If you're good, you can get a job anywhere in the world right now at way above nominal rates (if you know how to negotiate).
“It is very easy to get Bluetooth fitted in the ears. It is attached to the ear temporarily and can be removed. Such a technique was used by a Vyapam scam accused too to clear his medical exam eight years ago.”
And the article also mentions that the Indian Supreme Court themselves cancelled the licenses for 634 doctors licenses issued between 2008 - 2013.. some of which used this same technique.How it works, where does it go; I have no idea. But clearly it's not a one-off case.
P.S. I think that it's perhaps surgically clipped deep in the inner ear somehow, and not inserted beneath the skin.
So a few things would be interesting to see:
1.) Does the system work better if the dogs start & stop calls with buttons instead of shaking a ball?
2.) What if you added _other_ buttons for dogs to talk to other dogs? I think it might be boring for both human and dog because there is no physical aspect, but maybe dogs barking at each other would be interesting for them?
3.) When dogs learn the system, will we observe behaviors and customs change? Maybe they will call certain dogs more often, or create new rituals to start and stop calls. Maybe they will act like children (I mean this literally) where they just turn the video on, go about their day, and once in a while say something to each other.