kevinrineer

Is your org at the point where it would make sense just to upstream patches for FOSS projects and pull rather than patch and push to just your infra?

Just a matter of curiosity for me as my career progresses, where I think that is the ideal, but I don't work in a heavily privatized nor regulated space at the moment of posting.

I did read your latest blog post looking for an answer, but it wasn't clear to me from that reading.

So interesting to see Darpa represented in different labs. I wouldn't have bother to look for that interesting tidbit otherwise, so thanks for that.

Know any harnesses that explicitly don't have a "yolo" mode?

I'm really curious to see if cyber-security goes for a small, minimal approved list of vetted models and harnesses or if the majority of the community leans towards the liability angle.

One could compare it to the immediacy of an actor's overnight success shaped career.

Most business security cameras are powered by something and are most likely not tied to the emergency power lines.

This correction is not an endorsement.

Thanks for the rec. That repo is young, but the owner seems quite experienced.

I'll happily try it.

I am curious about your confidence for NFS for the nix store.

My thoughts, ignoring my technical disagreements, would be that you'd want to setup clients to have a specific set of software per their government role. A nix store could expose more software than you planned on supporting (e.g. forgotten software or licensed software).

I guess I'm poor then because my homelab has nodes with these specs.

Wonderful link. Just commenting to add: in the first video, Grant mentioned it would be a trilogy series.

> me: That's enough setup, you're exactly right.

So that's where in the training set current models get that phrase! /j

AlphaGo, Watson, Stockfish, Eliza. I can name so many of the interesting stuff and each new LLM just comes and goes.