kekub
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
Maybe that would be a good source to challenge and validate the values provided by your LLM approach.
Development costs: The bulk of an app's expense lies in its continuous development, not in hosting. Even if backend services can be run for a nominal fee, the time and expertise required for ongoing maintenance, updates, and improvements are significant.
Value proposition: Apps provide utility and solve problems for users. The price should reflect this value, not just the operational costs.
Sustainability: Charging for apps ensures developers can continue to support and improve their products, benefiting users in the long run.
Hidden costs: While server costs might be minimal, there are other expenses like development tools, testing devices, and occasional third-party services that add up.
From Google's standpoint, this issue may be considered a "new" bug, which means they need to conduct an investigation and address it. Consequently, a rollback is not a viable solution for them.
[1]: https://vanjs.org/