kay_o

There is no accessibility reason ever for covering up the light or recording. I will accept describing objects in FOV etc but nothing should be persistable or sent to a third party that trains on them and saves them without the consent of everyone in view, a company should build non-criminal glasses without these feature sets and have insurance pay for them.

Those glasses should be an actual crime everywhere.

It was interesting to me at my hotel for EDC -- many of the people were downright doomscrolling kalshi, polymarket like it was tiktok but would never go near the casino floor or touch a machine.

Not supposed to edit or touch any code, or review. Other agent reviews and approves. You only write prompt.

Touch one hardware key for every interaction then, not 123456, the hell?

The people using hetzner cloud are probably hosting CRUD apps

At what point in the slope does a regular musician fall toward credit card theft to pay for premium streaming accounts

on older gemini models ide have to actively give them encouragement and/or easy bait problems that they can correctively solve without issue to avoid runaway spiraling into "i'm useless and i want to kms" behaviour with complex use case.

I have not seen this in other models.

I am not saying anything is ok, where did you read that?

> There's no reason for that person to be allowed to operate a vehicle

Doesn't much of america outside of cities also have the secondary problem of you physically cannot feed yourself, get to appointments, or do anything without operating a vehicle?

Imho part of isuse here is that you cannot "partial AV" it.

You cannot have a car that will EVER need you to intervene or else it does not work because of awful human nature. The amount of tesla uber drivers ive had literally browsing tiktok, watching youtube UNTIL the car beeps that it is a green light detected, then they immediately hit the accelerator before looking up is ridiculous. You cannot have a half ass "autopilot" driving experience where you are expected to zone out and then be expected to take control within a millisecond during uncertainty. It does not help that FSD, AP, aAP, bAP, the model, whether the car is visual only all apply differently

Threat model a bit different, they can just request xcancel.com/unique-string and check what IP or account requested unique-string IMO

What about this can't be resolved by a PAC-file?

Probely because that is the entirety of it. There is zero story or creativity or anything else that goes into an actual game, virtually nothing is named and any that has is a simply word or two jammed together into a name -- the player guide is written in claudish and has a literal table of the number of roads.

I don't think this is so much a game as a figure out how much can be vibecoded, such a tech demo rather of an engine