karlkloss

Odd choice of microcontrollers for a tool that targets professional developers. That's nothing e.g. the automotive industry would use.

On one hand: Cool!

On the other hand: I have a lot of old hardware in my 'too good to go' garbage bin that can run a full fledged Linux, so what.

Rocky McRockface

That's how we do it here, because we have decades old production machines running Windows XP and other vintage software. There's a completely separated production network, wires only, no WiFi, that doesn't have a connection to the office network, and is managed by a separate department.

Still no affordable antigravity? Dang.

Thoughtcrime is now a felony.

3 - 3.01 = -0.009999999999999

That brings me back.

It couldn't detect my hardware at all, Win11 Intel Core Ultra 7 notebook with Nvidia RTX PRO 1000.

We just buried an ASIC design that was nearly finished. Reason: There was a deviation that would've needed a mask change, but because of AI chip demand, the manufacturer wanted so much money for it, that we said screw it.

So we now have AI powered chip design tools that make chip design cheaper, but because of AI, chip manufacturing has become so expensive, that we can't afford it anymore.

Nice.

From liberating concentration camps to running them. How tf did this happen? And why do people think this is ok?

I bet that the idea behind this is that they can block Chinese AI providers by claiming that they stole knowledge from US AI companies.

Nearly 60% of EU LNG imports come from the USA. If Trump doesn't like Canada to cuddle with the EU, then it won't happen.

This is all a big pain in the back.

What I'm missing in all of those one-shot tests:

How different are the results between multiple runs of the same setup?

And how many do wild cats kill? And how many would wild cats kill, if we allowed them to multiply as they want?

>I can't find any. Do you have a link?