karavelov

Why not use LLD for linking Rust? You already must have the LLVM for Rust to be buildable, so that do not add any dependency.

So what happened to FTC in 2025 that it’s not doing anymore consumer protection?

Even on older system types, you can provision .metal sizes and run anything on them.

Article says he was born in 1770s, so his missing father can be Loyalist

> I guess they also want expertise to launch stuff into space

Blue Origin is Jeff Bezos' private aerospace company

Yes, in the submodules of `std::arch`

I am sorry to break the news, but UK is not in EU, so registering a company in UK is of the same effect as registering it anywhere else outside EU

> Well, the configuration changes during takeoff mitigate the issue if it happens during takeoff. If it happens at any other time then they don’t do anything to help.

There are no birds at higher altitudes

Waiting for Sabine's comment: "Told you so, physics is dead"

It's just 6P + 8E + 2IO (ultra efficient) cores or less. Looks it's primary targeting laptops.

For interop between runtimes, they need to add `std::async` IO traits that could be implemented by each runtime.

why not switch to bird that was not affected at all? not just acknowledged and fixed. isn’t it “safe be default” better than “fixed after they pointed the flaw”

These are emulated `r1000` devices, not pass-through

I was using the same technique back in the day when I was maintaining my Pentax MXs but using a fluorescent lamp as a source - they blink with the AC power cycle - 50 or 60Hz depending on your country.

The cost of the CPU is small part of a server TCO. Graviton instances could be cheaper because the platform is cheaper, uses less power and needs less cooling - I think we know from Apple Silicon that ARM chips can have these advantages.

Disclaimer: I work for AWS but I don't have any internal knowledge about Graviton pricing and non-public performance data.