jy2947

Please correct me if I misunderstand how it works - basically the input to the countinuous-eval is "dataset" (for example jsonl file, with the in and out from a "retriever" step, potentially golden data too), and one example use case is, say an existing RAG pipeline continuously spit out the data to the dataset, and countinuous-eval can continuously calculate the metrics etc.

Isn't the typical responsibility of the manager or the team lead?

Inquire often is followed with more requests, if each developer serves as the weekly-speaker-of-the-team, will the external partner eventually figure out "John will do anything for us and Steve is mean"?

Thanks for sharing!

I also wonder whether the OP should have made clear decision (and expectation) between bootstraping vs startup, because I think they require different mentality, operation style and even market. With startup he and his cofounders could focus on applying incubator and/or angel investors early on. They would get some feedback on their ideas. They could even get a little funding to hire a designer or contractor to help build the UI (which appears to be the big drag). In this case you are trading ownership to additional support systems. If you do bootstrapping, then you'd need to prepare for the longer timeframe, and financial burden. Maybe still keep the original full-time job and working par-time on the side project.

Thanks, agree to every word.

But if Microsoft has teams in China, Russia work on MS Teams, I will be very concerned. The same goes with Slack, that many companies now rely on to keep business going.

What alerted me at that time was the discrepancy between their HR site at U.S of the Chinese opening (only one), and their job postings in Chinese job sites.

The R&D centers in China (I think there are 3 of them) are their competitive advantage - this can help them manage cost to be profitable from early on. I also think the engineering teams there can share with their peers of the other local Chinese tech firms. For example, China was literately put in lock down in February, and all of the business and schools went on-line in couple of days - that was a enormous achievement for anyone who participated the scaling infrastructure at the big tech companies in China, and I would not be surprised that the Zoom engineers in Chinese R&D learned couple of lessons from them. Zoom even has a feature that you can choose to "soften" your appearance to look "better" in the video conference, which has been feature of camera/image software popular in Asian market. So I suspect their product team may also have some connections there.

However, Zoom's biggest advantage is also its biggest risk, if they want to be part of the communication infrastructure of any business/government/university/etc in western countries, especially after so many security incidents that happened in the past years.

I think we all want 3 things -

1, back-end services with clear boundary, that decouple concerns based on dev teams' domain responsibilities, with less dependency among each other,and respected source of record. This is very much the "micro-service" is for.

2, middle tier services to consolidate or aggregate back-end APIs to serve the front-ends (especially the mobile apps) and take care of the business logic. Back-end guys all love micro-services, but someone must put them all together....GraphQL so far seems to fit this bill

3, Analytics and reporting, this is a totally different animal from the product development, and have almost opposite requirements. This is where whatever your ETL or Data Lake or Data Pipeline is used, along with your preferred BI or analytics tooling.

+1

I may be wrong - but I have a feeling that, technology companies like apple and google are developing software on device to make user data so protected that they will say "I can not technically to crack my software" even ordered by a Judge (presumably for legit reason), thus the DOJ is using this case trying to prevent it from happening. And, if this is the case, then personally I am at the DOJ side, because I recognize this is a less ideal world (actually I think it is even worse), and this country is technically in a war.

+1 I think the problem is not homework - it is there is no other reliable and affordable "better" alternative to homework or standard test. We can all argue that homework is taking away the time kids can otherwise spend on exercising, socializing, innovating etc, but truth is they are more likely just sitting there and playing their phones.

+1