Recent submissions

Comment · 1 hour ago
lol no good content has been created since 5 months humans have lost all creativity
Comment · 8 hours ago
I think there was another HN discussion about it re bounty value and as far as I remember the issue is not that big companies are greedy in that case, but rather that over time it’s strategically better to have lower bounties so less people are interested in it.

5 or 50k doesnt matter to them. And this bug in terms of severity is very high imho.

Comment · 1 day ago
When I want protection I put my money in my bank, when I want ownership I do crypto.

I’m aware that not every crypto would do that. I’m quite sure the BTC won’t get frozen.

Just saying. A non government controlled currency would help to a fairer less corrupt place, but that’s not what crypto is used for.

Imagine a world where governments can’t just print money to save reckless companies.

We would probs have less oligarchy

Comment · 2 days ago
Bro hold crypto for yourself. Like take some ownership, remember 12 words in your mind something and no matter what situation you have some money. Don’t put it anywhere except for whatever transactions you need to do
Comment · 2 days ago
Damn sorry my ai slopped.

Need to get better in prompting

Comment · 2 days ago
No lol
Comment · 2 days ago
I don’t think stolen crypto should be frozen. How is that different to banks? Why do I need crypto now ?
Comment · 2 days ago
You can have crypto without hardware wallets
Comment · 2 days ago
My problem is right now that every kind of reviewing process adds un-needed complexity which later slows down your agility and increases your cost and performance degrades.

If you have feature and 6 different reviewers go over it the logic bulks up easily. I wonder how other guys handle that? I’m all up and I want this to work, but this is my current constraint.

I often get bad suggestions from reviewing monitors because they get something wrong. Sometimes I get good ones, very good ones, but some are bad. So I’m always down to look at reviews about bugs, but I would be afraid after 6 reviewers its just a bunch of text and its confusing me so end result is worse as me looking through actual critical stuff. My context is limited too and completely hands-off is not reliable enough...

How do you guys do it?

Comment · 4 days ago
material exploration is algorithms nowadays
Comment · 4 days ago
Okay I looked it up. I think the answer is here we don’t know it depends on if the physical world is discrete or not and we don’t know that yet.
Comment · 4 days ago
I think first it’s artificial colonisation
Comment · 4 days ago
Like we haven’t solved it but it we partly did finish birth in an artificial womb and we have birthed extinct species through a different breed.

Theoretically it might be possible to do embryo arks where you would send machines to a new habitable planet and they would travel for hundreds of of thousand of years then build everything up and then artificially bring humans back to life.

Whilst this obviously has an enormous amount of challenges, we don’t know a physical law that is not allowing that.

Imagine what we do now and what we do in 100.000+ years when we face extinction.

We might also just blow us up, even though I think extinction is very unlikely

Practically an embryo ark

Comment · 5 days ago
I honestly think they are both finite lol.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton