jwpapi
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
5 or 50k doesnt matter to them. And this bug in terms of severity is very high imho.
I’m aware that not every crypto would do that. I’m quite sure the BTC won’t get frozen.
Just saying. A non government controlled currency would help to a fairer less corrupt place, but that’s not what crypto is used for.
Imagine a world where governments can’t just print money to save reckless companies.
We would probs have less oligarchy
Need to get better in prompting
If you have feature and 6 different reviewers go over it the logic bulks up easily. I wonder how other guys handle that? I’m all up and I want this to work, but this is my current constraint.
I often get bad suggestions from reviewing monitors because they get something wrong. Sometimes I get good ones, very good ones, but some are bad. So I’m always down to look at reviews about bugs, but I would be afraid after 6 reviewers its just a bunch of text and its confusing me so end result is worse as me looking through actual critical stuff. My context is limited too and completely hands-off is not reliable enough...
How do you guys do it?
Theoretically it might be possible to do embryo arks where you would send machines to a new habitable planet and they would travel for hundreds of of thousand of years then build everything up and then artificially bring humans back to life.
Whilst this obviously has an enormous amount of challenges, we don’t know a physical law that is not allowing that.
Imagine what we do now and what we do in 100.000+ years when we face extinction.
We might also just blow us up, even though I think extinction is very unlikely
Practically an embryo ark