wr
hn
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Back
j
justlurkin12
Joined 5 years ago
Karma
14
Submissions
6
Member since
Jan 29
View on Hacker News
Recent submissions
Comment · 5 years ago
Actually if RH didn't wire over the funds, they would be dissolved due to illiquidity.
Comment · 5 years ago
T+0 implies same day not instant. I think you can enable all of those features with hours of delay instead of days.
Comment · 5 years ago
That's my question as well. I think it's because the customer capital has to be transferred to the counterparty that issued the sell. I imagine that it makes things complicated if the DTCC has to send over 1-10% of this amount and then the brokerage that executed the buy has to send over the rest so, if I had to guess, they did this for simplicity's sake. Btw the requirement to not use customer collateral is enforced by the DTCC and not at a brokerage level discretion.
Comment · 5 years ago
Real time securities wouldn't need brokerages to front collateral while the trades settle by the virtue of no settling period. They would only have to deal with customer capital used to buy the stock.
Comment · 5 years ago
dumb question, why is not practical? As for the root problems, those are not related to the issue from last week (not sure if you're aware, but margin had no factor in play with the DTCC requirements).