Recent submissions

Comment · 4 hours ago
Yeah, we know. The technology is definitely impressive, and kinda fascinating actually, I must admit. If you ignore the huge externalities and all the problems it creates, that is.

Can you just guys go vibecoding and stop trying to convince us or yourselves?

Comment · 4 hours ago
I'm kinda bored to read these pro AI arguments, which seem to come by waves. Suddenly everyone seems to say the same thing at the same time and it's been like this for months. Previously it was "it's there to stay", and then "you will be left behind if you don't use it", and this week it's "coding by yourself is for hobbies" or "is like artisanal work [which is cute but not really productive]".

Is it the $3B anthropic pretends to spend on marketing doing its job?

Comment · 8 hours ago
> I can’t find a reason to anymore that’s actually necessary

The huge environmental and societal cost of LLMs, maybe?

Why do these questions implying writing code is a thing of the past keep coming?

Anthropic pretend in their S1 filling that they spend $3B in marketing, there's no need to help them really.

Comment · 21 hours ago
It doesn't necessarily go to court. In the past, there was a project that was a light fork of Signal, LibreSignal, that was Signal but without the google libraries. They have asked the developers to stop distributing a version of it that connected to their network, and the developers stopped the distribution.

I guess they didn't do so for Molly. I suppose a lot of water has passed under the bridge.

Comment · 1 day ago
Software license ≠ terms of service.

They can give you the right to reuse their source code for building your own service using your own network (an aspire to give you this right), but still forbid you to connect to their service on their network with third party clients.

In practice, they don't seem to enforce that a lot (anymore).

Comment · 1 day ago
It's like Agile, if it doesn't work, they must be doing it wrong.
Comment · 3 days ago
CC BY-SA requires attribution. And is actually quite like GPL, in that it requires derivatives to be under CC BY-SA too!
Comment · 3 days ago
Linux being GPL doesn't matter here because it's not used in AlpineBSD.
Comment · 3 days ago
> They are not onboard with the innovation that was GPLv3. That innovation was mostly about software patents iirc

I think what Linus is against in the GPLv3 is mostly the anti-tivoisation mechanisms. He wants tivoisation as a feature for the Linux kernel.

Comment · 5 days ago
Oh yeah, I think I remember reading they demote submissions that they think will cause low quality discussions. I don't think that's related to downvoting or your karma.
Comment · 5 days ago
I wish it was hyperbole. Describing our crazy world makes you sound crazy now. You seem to take me somewhat seriously so I'll develop a bit, but it's an HN comment so I can only go so far. The paper I linked or the author of Ghost in the Machine take hours to explain this way better than me.

People behind GenAI are fascists: for some it's obvious by now I hope (trump, elon musk). They are otherwise techbros who seek power and control other the world, and it doesn't matter if it causes harm [1] or a major economical crisis.

This thing has been brutally imposed onto us quickly and without debate, even if its explicit aim is to replace us. (The idea itself of being thrilled to design a system aiming at replacing human intelligence is a bit disgusting - with a very costly stochastic text generator no less! And the push to anthropolomorphize it is also disgusting).

LLM benchmarks are all rooted in eugenist (thus racist) pseudo science to measure intelligence, which of course biases them all towards these theories.

These tools of control are everywhere in all the aspects of our lives (work, culture, measure, institutions), which is another aspect of fascism.

They are built and run without care for the environment, pushing huge off-grid datacenters [2] when the people mostly don't want them, sometimes illegally cutting trees [3]. They are built stealing the work of everyone without our conscent, they hammer websites which incurs cost on the whole web only to sell it back to us through costly subscriptions (see also the ai tag jwz's blog, which I won't link from here).

Every aspect of GenAI is fascist. I wish it was hyperbole. I wish it was ridiculous.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/sam-altman-says-ai-benefits-...

[2] https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/off-grid-data-centers-have...

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2026/...

Comment · 5 days ago
Comment · 5 days ago
Prove me wrong then. Show me the light.
Comment · 5 days ago
This is a strawman, and you are turning the situation around. I'm not the one who originally insinuated one group was obviously wrong. I pushed back.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton