jpdoctor
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
Conversely, it takes a special kind of arrogance for two (incredibly different) presidents, both houses of the U.S. Congress, both political parties, the U.S. court system and more than 30,000 of his co-workers to ignore the fact that 54% of people surveyed think this is a good thing.
http://swampland.time.com/2013/06/13/new-time-poll-support-f...
Did anybody think he was secretly using vi in the closet?
HN doesn't seem to make the distinction, for self-funding of less than $100K.
The thing I find particularly fatuous: "We were bootstrapped until we took VC money", as if everyone who takes VC money isn't in the same camp. I guess the company I founded was bootstrapped until our A round valued at $40M. Hey I created a $40M company by bootstrapping!
So they can't rule out the possibility that sensitive personal information, which cannot be accessed, has been accessed. Got it.
Apparently our intelligence, which cannot be insulted, has been insulted.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
There will be much unhappiness and gnashing of teeth before it's all finished.
I wonder what effect that will have on future muni workers?
Very much agree.
> However it's absolutely not true that "a lot of money in the US is being lent with the assumption that creditors will always be bailed out by the state or federal government", at least not a large amount relative to the total bond market size.
This is more subtle. While bankruptcies even on the scale of Detroit don't work with an implicit backstop assumption, large-scale muni bankruptcies on the scale predicted by Meredith Whitney are a different story. Let's face it: When push came to shove, Fannie and Freddie were not allowed to enter runoff mode.
There doesn't seem to be an opinion that this will kick over the can and start the bankruptcy run, but throw in a couple of more and the political&banking dynamics would turn interesting in a hurry.
People (and the press) need to stop printing nonsense like this. You don't need money? Then don't take it. Any other path screams: We needed money and we're gonna insult your intelligence with a press statement.
To his specific point: The cost of funding would buy a whole lotta press. So cut the crap.