jpatt
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
The main difference is that pre-2021 UK travellers simply had to show travel documents whereas now they have to get them stamped.
On the surface, it isn't clear to me why that makes much of a difference in service time, but the CEO of Eurostar pointed a finger to these changes in January: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64390979, claiming their trains carry 30% fewer passengers due to station bottlenecks.
And yes, they claim the EES checks should help speed this bottleneck.
There will not be sufficient space to handle London-bound passengers at the station, given the more intensive post-Brexit formalities.
Not sure about the space intensity of pre- vs post-Brexit controls to fact-check the article.They're still running the line from London to Amsterdam, which is why the line is still running and why the trains have to deadhead back.
https://www.pd.com.au/blogs/how-many-cars-in-the-world/
North America is already auto-dependent and EVs are an important piece of the puzzle for that region. Their point is that EVs won’t possibly work resource or cost-wise when that 82% inevitably gets richer and asks, “what about me?”
The comment I'm replying to said something to the effect of: "this may be a good thing because by democratizing highly paid professions, lower income workers will be lifted."
My comment said something to the effect of: "I disagree, I think capital owners will simply get more rich and the middle class will collapse further without raising anyone."
Of course our society doesn't give service workers a fair shake. My partner worked in a grocery store for a large chunk of our relationship. The schedule inconsistency, the sleep deprivation, the lack of healthcare, no vacation, no real sick leave, and on. Much of my family works in blue collar oil positions. There you're paid a bit better, but you throw away your body to make a dime. I know.
I'm just not convinced the default outcome of automating some knowledge workers is that magically somehow that makes everyone's lives better. I think legislative change of some kind would have to happen if that's the outcome we want.
Automating America's remaining paths to the middle class will only serve to widen the gap between capital owners who will own infrastructure for automation and those shoved into a shrinking piece of the unautomated pie.
Just seems like there will never be a Scotsman capable of appeasing this standard.
Exposure to computer architecture and organization, information management, networking and communication, operating systems, and parallel and distributed computing.
But they only require "exposure" to these concepts whereas algorithms, theory, programming languages, etc are required to be "substantial." Which matches with your perceptions: It seems most are exposed to them partially through project work but without the base knowledge.
[0] https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/cr...In Ruby/Java it is certainly a bit more of a chore to remember to do.
Now that we have pretty decent open source models, anyone can create a new business to supply more tokens. Sure there’s short term scarcity: energy, GPUs, cooling, but this is a scale up problem. More token demand = more data center build = more energy plant build. This downward pressure will also keep frontier private model prices in check.
Differentiation seems to be happening at the harness level, whereby we can expect token spend to be a metric to compete on and drive down for the customer (at least hoping tools in the application space don’t continue token based billing as their primary revenue stream).
These are not short term hyper growth forces, but a fundamental alignment of incentives.