Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago
The also just secured a $10 Billion contract with the US military, which is one of the largest emitters of carbon on the planet.

Americans have been reticent to downsize the military for the benefit of everyone else on the planet, but we might just get around to it for our own benefit in reducing emissions.

Comment · 7 years ago
Three things are true:

* We cannot let despair prevent us from acting. The big changes needed are possible, and we need to accelerate them.

* We actually don't know with certainty how bad it is going to get.

* People, in general, are not scared enough right now.

Comment · 7 years ago
The satire is a little imprecise here, but this is literally why there's a Green New Deal being proposed. We can address climate change AND make sure everyone has a livelihood while society undergoes the massive changes necessary.
Comment · 7 years ago
The future of the species is literally imperiled right now because we've allowed rich people to hoard wealth, so that's a reason to care.
Comment · 7 years ago
What you're missing is nuclear is too slow to spin up! We simply don't have time. We need to cut emissions 50% in 10 years, and nuclear is not going to get us there. Look to other renewables.
Comment · 7 years ago
you're going to let a bunch of astroturfing people wreck your platform and it's not going to be useful to anyone. you're being naive.
Comment · 7 years ago
We have 10 years to cut 50% of emissions. We literally can't build enough nuclear plants in that time, it's very slow. It's also really expensive. We have to use other renewables.
Comment · 7 years ago
Wow, this doesn't instill confidence in your moderation abilities. You need to show people who "disagree on the causes" the door.
Comment · 7 years ago
Because nuclear takes too long to spin up - we don't have time.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton