joshuajill

GNU kind communication guidelines the report purports to be transphobic:

"Please think about how to treat other participants with respect, especially when you disagree with them. For instance, call them by the names they use, and refer to them using words whose meanings (as you understand them) cover those participants' stated gender identities. Please also show tolerance and respect for people who do that using different words from the words you use."

Also strongly disagree with stopping support FSF, in particular from an anonymous group.

Recommendations are quite of, despite the generally accurate and reasonable report.

For once doesn't seem like a hit piece, the arguments are pretty solid and well documented.

Very thorough job and if RMS was smart he would gracefully step down.

The only argument I find here against it is the question of whether someone's personal opinions should be a reason to be removed from a leadership position.

Edit: Oh wow just read the recommendations. Can't agree to most of it, sorry.

I find the fact that media keeps talking about cancer as one single disease unhelpful at best.

Look at what the title of the research article is: "Antioxidants stimulate BACH1-dependent tumor angiogenesis"

The researchers conclusion: "We conclude that BACH1 is an oxygen- and redox-sensitive angiogenesis transcription factor."

Then compare how the author of the article put it.

There is Shaarli and Wallabag (archives pages to read later) Both open source and self hostable.

That said, like the barebones design.

Had my share of free beer for eternity.

KLA was actually funded by the US

He says it wasn't likely because most systems were analogically controlled. Emphasis in most.

Wonder if that makes sense given that Europe has just become dependent on US gas, and US being the main proponent of sanctions.

Quoting the Washington Post:

> Portions of the operation have been disclosed earlier, including in a 1996 paper in Studies in Intelligence, a CIA journal.

But the main motivation for the Russians would be giving them a pretext to attack other infrastructure.

Fair call Russia might have done it for those and other reasons.

However

1) Was there any gas flowing at all? Sure anything can cause speculation.

2) This also makes it a convenient timing for the western allies to do it, including Norway. Germany is way too complacent with Russian for US liking.

3) Such more so the US in terms of operatives in Europe and Russia. Who says the US is sensitive to gas prices in Europe?

Also Biden said they would do it. And at this point capabilities are not laking in either side.

But no we're not going to know for sure for a while.