joseda-hg

They've since implemented permanent no expiration cache for logged in users so... Either they don't prefer new chats, or this it their really indirect way of discouraging it

You can get a an order prefilled

With computer use Both Astra and Sol have been able to make sense of my markdown recipes, and based on those place prepare a shopping cart for me to review and finish buying

Probably a bit much for the average user though, even if it's trivial to setup

Gmail, Meet and Presentations do all of those

People use them, if for no other reason, because they are cheap, or are part of the Chromebook generation and have gotten used to it

Of their suite, Presentation and Sheets are the only ones people really have gripes about, Sheets by power users because it isn't Excel and it can never be, and Presentations because it's the ugly duckling of the suite

So far, yes

They usually reduce usage consumption in line with cost reductions (But not always 1:1)

It's fantasy and fantasy is clearly for children

I assume via metadata, classified externally, which is a large part of the selling point of Jellyfin

If you're, say, Theo, you can selfhost email all you want, but it still ties down your YouTube channel, AdSense, etc., with little to no recourse.

Isn't this what Brave tried to push? You get their Basic Attention Token crypto

If they're trained on the output of a larger model... Would they inherit "thinking" that they know more than they do?

It'd be interesting to see if distillation increases hallucinations for specific topics the larger LLM is confident in

I don't know if this was universal, but when I was a student we weren't allowed calculators until I believe 10th grade

You learn stuff by heart, so that when you mess up with the calculator you have a feel that stuff has gone wrong

I get that the propietary harness is better most of the time, but if this is really a risk factor to consider why not go with one of the open source harnesses?

Pi/OpenCode seem pretty straight foward and widely used enough for this to be viable

OMP as I understand does it's own vendoring of tools, so I assume it'd be a pain in the ass to audit, but that means you're even safe from base OS shenanigans

How would you compare it to C#? Stable-ish There's a lot of documentation and plenty of stablished patterns, so LLM can produce it no sweat Everything and the Kitchen Sink Performant, and safeish, even if not null safe

Subtler yes, but you can't point them or get good feedback for interactions, except I guess the hat

Then you can filter only the visible part of the signal, plus if they become common you risk interference, contamination or long term exposure (Your face regularly points to other people faces/eyes)