jobs_throwaway

I don't believe legacy mathematicians kept their reasoning secret after they published. Quite the opposite—they were giving talks and lectures, responding to criticisms, and generally convincing the community that they were right. OpenAI has done none of that.

Performance of their flagship model

> Meanwhile, Anthropic/OpenAI will struggle to survive the next 24 months on their current trajectory.

Want to make a wager? I think it's wildly unlikely that Anthropic/OpenAI will not survive the next 24 months

It is obviously political, but the same practices happened under Biden and Obama. It is very clearly a both-sides issue, and I'm not sure how voting for dems is supposed to help.

Then why have they been lagging behind OpenAI and Anthropic for most of the last few years, and only briefly been at the frontier?

I don't think it's obnoxious at all to point out that forgoing nearly half your lifespan in order to avoid a painful death implies that you don't value your life much

As noted, it helps prevent mouth and throat cancers. Also, it helps contribute to herd immunity. The more men get it, the less of the disease will be floating around.

The upsides are significant and the downsides are nil. It's a no-brainer.

Nice work!

No. There is some very limited evidence that it may help existing infections but not enough to say with any certainty.

What 'science' says that the economy is over, friend?

Of course not. But if you are given the choice of it at 45 or 80, which are you taking?

If you haven't gotten your HPV vaccine yet—go get it. One of the easiest interventions you can take to reduce your cancer risk.

That sounds far better than dying at 45 unless you have an extraordinarily unpleasant life in the interim

> we now have programmatic intelligence powerful enough to do most white-collar work

> the economy is over

Hackernews' neuroticism remains undefeated