jnordwick

I'm doing it in K2 this year (a language that has a single data structure: a vector). If you can do it in K2, you can do it in Go.

You can put a window that covers the bottom half of the content the defaults to all assaults being allowed also has a way to customize which assaults you would like. It shouldn't be possible to uncheck necessary assaults for the website might not work.

Can't this be solved to some sort of DP way of solving the sub problem?

Do the payout between 0 and 1 as the percentage of the amount.

With a range of 1 to 1 to pay off is obviously one

With a range of 1 to 2 the payout is .5

At three values it becomes more interesting. There are two strategies for the candidate either a binary search for the endpoints.

At four values you still have one level of binary search possible but after that it devolves down to the two value problem.

At five values. If the interviewer thinks the candidate would choose binary search and it becomes too too value problems on each side after removing the middle element.

There's definite problems with this but I wonder if he's already possible pay off matrix

I hate that. It turns the problem into one of those lateral thinking puzzles we were told some basic information and then the answer winds up being something totally wildly different. It wasn't being very random in the end not being very productive

Does anybody else always read this as Hyrule's Law?

I took cs61a at Berkeley as my very first computer science class I couldn't program I never tried to so scheme was my first language.

My ta told me that everybody should take the class twice when you first come in and when you're graduating.

When you first take it especially if you know other languages like C at the time you don't get the full depth of the problems you're given a great introduction and you think you understand everything but you don't realize the depth of complexity. Message passing the metacircular evaluator, continuations as the basis of all flow control, etc

You think they are neat tricks that you understand the curriculum because you can do the homework you don't understand how those neat tricks are really the basis of everything else you'll do.

When you're graduating you've had time to go through all your classes you realize just how foundation was principles are and you get so much more out of the book.

Well I didn't take the class a second time I need help grade and TA for a couple semesters.

I work as a quant developer and in trading now and even though my field has nothing to do with that I still think it's the basis of me as a developer.

I thought the Branch Target Predictor on x64 was global, not local, and it has to kick in before decode so even direct branches can be mispredicted. Branch prediction is 2 parts - the conditional predictor and the target predictor. The conditional predictor is actually per 64 byte instruction block (so if you have a few branches consecutively they share branch predictor entries and can step on each other. the target predictor uses a global history and needs to happen very early to keep the front end fed.

CH definitely has more installations. not sure about which pulls in more revenue. KDB installations will run you $250,000/yr on the low-end for just the software license. Not sure how that compares.

You're making a couple mistakes on this.

The first is you're using the Nationwide averages as opposed to the regional numbers for New York where a lot of these increases are much greater than on the nation.

The second thing is the way it includes housing is by using a thing called the owners imputed rent. And what that does is it tries to back out the rental from a housing unit. The problem is in New York City rent has been rising way faster than that.

30 is the cpi's consistently underestimated a number of its own provisions because of the way it does hedonics and substitution. It basically says that while meat might have risen 50% people switch to fish now and it uses in lower value for inflation.

The CPI over the last 30 years have been so massively game it's almost useless anymore

kdb+ isn't in there either, and that is more important than CH I think. KDB is boring, just uses a placeholder. I think it might be because these two do it in a boring fashion.

I thought if I shook him enough, he'd stop crying. I was kind of right.

If it's in the footer, then I'm pending to the columns out of the question it seems without moving the footer.