jmvoodoo

This article is about American wealth inequality so I’ll assume you’re talking about the US. The US already taxes global income, so moving away is not enough. You could renounce citizenship, but then you lose all the benefits of citizenship and you must pay capital gains an all assets whether you sell them or not.

The “they’ll just leave” argument doesn’t really hold up in this case.

Check out Lattis, getlattis.ai

We (some friends and I) built it because we wanted to understand how these things worked and also had max accounts. It has since grown into a ton more, but is still in essence a very full featured local proxy.

Right but no court follows French law so who cares?

Thank you. This is far easier to understand than the OP.

I've been building my own IDE that works the way do (and those in my social circles/professional life do). It allows for use of multiple agent harnesses (i.e claude code, codex, pi, opencode), and makes worktrees much easier to work with. Also has its own code review workflow. My coworkers and several friends have all started using it now. Its been an absolute blast to build, and has definitely increased our productivity vs VS Code, Zed, or Cursor.

It could also help foreign adversaries. I have 0 confidence that Flock hasn’t already been compromised given the current security environment and the value of the data that they have.

I’ve only hit it twice. First time was a code review. Fair.

2nd time was literally me being lazy and telling it to commit and open a PR.

Very strange.

I’ve been working on a project to solve this problem with Claude code, codex, etc by recording usage and translating to $ in realtime. Looks like I’ll have to add Cursor support now.

I bought a bosgame version for $2199 back in February.

You can't as far as I'm aware unless you control the entire batch during inference, or don't use batching which would require you to run your own inference.

When I read the paper I immediately wondered if this would work. Good to see that someone has tried it and indeed it does!

A creditor calling debt because you violated your covenants is not a rugpull. That's how creditors insure they can be paid back before you predictably run out of money.

So, essentially the system has a serious denial of service flaw. I wonder how many variations of flight plans can cause different but similar errors that also force a disconnect of primary and secondary systems.

Seems "reject individual flight plan" might be a better system response than "down hard to prevent corruption"

Bad assumption that a failure to interpret a plan is a serious coding error seems to be the root cause, but hard to say for sure.

This is very well thought out advice. That said you do need to be focused on the right areas of tax code, and understand that some things can be changed later and some things cannot (at least, not easily or without significant expense).

For example, I relocated to Puerto Rico several years ago and am taking advantage of a 50% transferrable R&D tax credit. Because it's transferrable I can sell the tax credit to people that have a tax liability even if I don't.

After fees, this means I get roughly 40% cash back on my R&D expense. This is a big deal to me and my company.

If you don't do your home work you can potentially miss out on some great opportunities. That said, you do still need to build a good business, or the best tax structure in the world won't save you.