jlardinois
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
If we want to get past the perception that this industry is of, by, and for misogynistic manchildren, maybe we should start by not being misogynistic manchildren.
I opened a Coinbase account back in college ~6 years ago when they were giving $10 in Bitcoin to anyone who signed up with a .edu email address. I forgot about it until last summer, when I realized that amount was now worth around $160.
I didn't have access to my college email anymore, so having to provide proof of identity was reasonable; having the entire process take a month wasn't. They also do this particularly insidious thing where if they don't respond to your request for two weeks or so, they automatically close it as unresolved. They do automatically reopen it if you send another email, but that you have to do that in the first place is dumb.
I disagree, corporate chats still have plenty of reason to want access to historical user-to-user chats. Ignoring the cynical reasons, institutional memory isn't confined to channel chats.
I've had it happen to me with Levi's, and word of mouth tells me this is a problem in general with big name clothing.
http://www.sfgate.com/restaurants/article/Old-Taco-Bell-site...
Also, discrimination against overqualified applicants is now illegal in California, but I imagine it still happens.