jjmellon
Joined 8 years ago
Joined 8 years ago
However, the article ignores the fact that many of the ones that are capable of being sold are never sold.
How about just properly reporting and studying the actual facts from one of the very large real world trials, like the one in India?
Until there's somebody who is willing to be embarrassed by the state of this software, and able to do something about it, there is no hope here. It does not get better.
There are far too many out-of-the-box bugs and glitches to consider this a usable product. For example, the convergence dock will not display on a monitor. Firefox browser displays too wide for the phone screen, so unusable. A dozen other issues on first day.
Even a development board should work better than this, have documentation of the known problems, and have some support mechanism that works.
I don't think better/more expensive hardware is the problem. It's software, caused by lack of users, lack of investment, and too many "competing" distributions of Linux.
It would be interesting to see what estimate was provided in the 1974 article referenced in the piece.