jjackson5324
Joined 6 years ago
Karma
68
Submissions
104
Member since
Jun 18
Recent submissions
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
I don’t know about other countries but that’s absolutely the case for the US.
The culprit is the AMA.
> In the 20th century, the AMA has frequently lobbied to restrict the supply of physicians, contributing to a doctor shortage in the United States.[10][11][12] The organization has also lobbied against allowing physician assistants and other health care providers to perform basic forms of health care. The organization has historically lobbied against various of government-run health insurance.
Comment · 2 years ago
> At least that's my observation
30 seconds of serious thought would tell you that your observation is wrong.
Again, a news organization can just change their robots.txt to block google from indexing their site.
They don't do that because that would instantly kill all their search traffic... and most likely kill their business.
If CNN changed their robots.txt to stop being indexed by Google, Google would literally lose 0 users.
> I wasn't picking a side as much as earnestly asking how OP concluded that its the news sites wanting something free from Google versus the other way around.
It's been explained to you several times. Instead you're more interested in acting self-righteous (it's honestly pretty cringeworthy).
Comment · 2 years ago
What are you even talking about? That's not how SEO works in the slightest....?
Lol am I still reading HN or is this Reddit?
You can see the Core Web Vitals. What modern day news organizations are doing is nowhere close to that.
Comment · 2 years ago
No but the company isn't trying to develop software that's best for the user. They're trying to develop software that's best for their bottom line.
Comment · 2 years ago
Yeah, this guy clearly doesn't use Reddit
Comment · 2 years ago
> while real applications have seemingly gotten worse
Can you elaborate on this? I'm not sure I agree.
Modern day applications are doing far, far more than they were 10-15 years ago. Much more traffic, much more data, much more tracking (unfortunately), etc.
Comment · 2 years ago
I agree with you, but PG’s definition of rich in the article is people worth $10 billion dollars plus.
I don’t think he’s being malicious. I think he genuinely just doesnt see a $5-10m NW as rich.
Comment · 2 years ago
That depends entirely on your definition of rich.
PG's definition of rich is probably 100x what yours is.
Comment · 2 years ago
> Everyone should dislike Elon Musk. He's a horrible person and needlessly rich. The man has sociopathic tendencies. We just have to listen to his ethos to determine that.
Thanks for telling me what to think.
> But it is not designed for "depression-like symptoms". It is designed for acute depressive mood disorders and suicide ideation which cannot be treated by other means, similar to electroshock therapy or TMS.
That's literally not true. Spend a few mins reading a survey paper on it perhaps? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28249076/
Comment · 2 years ago
I understand that the MSM hates Elon Musk but it's sad that they have to spread misinformation about Ketamine Therapy in their lust for clicks.
It's had amazing results for treating depression -> https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/ketamine-for-treatment-r...
Comment · 2 years ago
This feels like using the internet in 1996 or the iPhone in 2010. Not quite there yet, but you can clearly see that this is going to be massive within a few years.
Comment · 2 years ago
Yep, the only solution is more disinformation police.
Clearly they saved us during the pandemic!
Comment · 2 years ago
theverge's coverage of anything not directly related to gadget reviews is always incredibly biased, sensationalist and usually wrong.
Comment · 2 years ago
> But if what you say is actually true
You can google it if you want. It's all public info.
Isaacson also wrote a book on Musk and there's a chapter about this pay package and how absurd it was.
That’s the view of the government?