jiojk542
Joined 12 years ago
Karma
-12
Submissions
5
Member since
Apr 3
Recent submissions
Comment · 12 years ago
But there now seems to be a police on moral thought. If someone dares to speak against an opinion that the left holds dearly, they're now subjected to having their careers and lives ruined. Don't you think this stifles alternative thought?
Comment · 12 years ago
And yet, his views are totally liberal relative to the views you find in some Muslim countries, where homosexuals are sentenced to death or are just killed outright. Why aren't you focused on that, instead of worrying about the definition of marriage for the time being? Aren't there much larger fish to fry?
Comment · 12 years ago
Again... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance
And why is it "objectively" morally wrong? Who gets to decide this? There is no scientific consensus on the causes of homosexuality.
Comment · 12 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance
Sexual orientation does not equal race. Scientists have never isolated a gay gene. There are no definitive causes of homosexuality. His opinion of homosexuality as a choice is as scientifically valid as your belief that it's innate. Why is he wrong and you right?
Comment · 12 years ago
"The right wing of american politics is an avid user of and believer in boycotts."
Which companies have they boycotted? The recent organized calls for boycotts include Chick-Fil-A, Mozilla, Walmart, McDonald's, etc. I haven't seen the right calling for a boycott of companies that supported gay marriage initiatives. Seems like the left is more into boycotts than the right.