Recent submissions

Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
You're right, we should all of us just give up and develop RSI
Comment · 12 years ago
Reminds me of this article from way back when:

http://thingist.com/item/4372/

Not exactly the same, but talks about this attitude prevalent among tech types that encourages belittling of those less experienced/knowledgable.

Comment · 12 years ago
"Responsive" is pretty factual - something either is or it isn't responsive.

"Beautiful" and "awesome", however, I could do without seeing everywhere for a few months. Especially "awesome".

Comment · 12 years ago
Think how many Yahoo Chat users are under 18. Now think how many candid photos of those minors were taken and stored by this government agency.
Comment · 12 years ago
Veering wildly off topic, but I haven't heard much from the jilted Google Reader crowd for a while. Have they found something new, or are we now living in a post-RSS world?
Comment · 12 years ago
I'm using an off-the-shelf ecig, the type that's designed to look like a regular cigarette. I'm loving /r/electronic_cigarette and all the clever mods they've been coming up with.

I have to be honest though, all of the various options are a bit overwhelming!

Comment · 12 years ago
>What's the problem with recreational ingestion of nicotine? It's a light stimulant; I'm not sure why this is any worse than caffeine. And certainly isn't worse than other medications like opiates or amphetamines.

You're not wrong. But that's the problem - it's not enough to say "sure X is harmful, but so's Y, so it's alright". Ingesting nicotine by itself is a hell of a lot less harmful than taking it with tar and everything else that comes in a normal cigarette. But it's still a highly addictive substance, and personally, my concern is that marketing something highly addictive to the public (and, dare I say it, young people) is really seedy.

Comment · 12 years ago
That's a shame. The "smoke" from e-cigarettes is just vapour, and no more harmful to the people around the user than steam from a kettle.

However, there's a discussion to be had here, and it's possibly more important than the one surrounding cigarettes and second-hand smoke. It's a brand new industry and a brand new habit that people are only starting to adjust to.

Ecig manufacturers are, at present, allowed to advertise their product publicly, and sell them as a lifestyle choice. They're even allowed to advertise on TV, something that the tobacco boys haven't been able to do for a very long time (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2517504/VIP-E-cigare...).

As an ecig user myself I find myself using it indoors regularly. I'm harming nobody but myself with it. But that's the problem - it's normalised the recreational ingestion of nicotine, and it's only going to become more popular.

Smokers, even reformed smokers like myself, aren't going to change their habits unless they're forced to do so. So while many people are put off by indoor ecig use, until the law changes to forbid it, you're just going to have to deal with it.

Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
Veering off topic, but I wonder what people would say if analytics for websites required telling the user what data is being gathered about them before requiring an active opt-in.
Comment · 13 years ago
Sorry, but you can't seriously compare uptime of cloud-based services to hard-disk failure.

I've been using computers since I was 12, so about 17 years, and in that time I've had two hard disks break on me. I'm sure you're going to say you've had a lot more, but if your hard disks are going out of action at a rate even near to how often Google's core services drop out, well, you're doing something wrong.

"Shit happens" is never a valid excuse, even for a service provided at no cost to the user.

Comment · 13 years ago
He was out of phone as well as Internet contact. Maybe HN should send homing pigeons when a link gets popular?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton