jester997
Joined 1 month ago
Joined 1 month ago
Programmers typically don’t know law outside of which license allows them to get code for free.
My advice: read lots of real books. Go to the library and study with real books even (especially) if it takes longer.
If you want human review on the code I’m thinking keep it simple and just review in branches/tags before merging OR even just have loose patch files.
As we’re seeing with resurgence of command-line utility by agents, that extends equally well to the O.G. diff/patch. A PR is literally just a diff with commentary and an approval process prior to merging. Diffs can be attached to forum topics and so-forth.
Lots of possibilities, but I think the main thing discussed here is how is version control better suited to AI agents moving forward.
I am curious what people think about the use case that is different for AI agents compared to humans. Aside from the things people use SCM for already that is.
Fossil fits the bill if you ask me because it has built in forum and stuff too, so Agentic discourse can happen there, commits happen in the SCM history. And it has auto sync so they can automatically sync their state.