jessep

Joined 18 years ago

Karma
1,810
Submissions
240
Member since
Oct 31
I like to build things.

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jessep; my proof: https://keybase.io/jessep/sigs/luUumjsysevLh1NhyAD6WvRrgmenaU-w99HcjxR8y78 ]

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 5 months ago
Hahahahahha. I love this. Brilliant work.
Comment · 7 months ago
Yeah, I’ve notice that people have started to sound like LLMs even when the LLMs aren’t writing for them. Not stupid people. Not lazy people. Some of the smartest people I know —- I can’t figure out how to use an em dash here, but you get the point.
Comment · 10 months ago
Sort of related, but we had to shard as usage grew and didn’t have uuids and it was annoying. Wasn’t the most annoying bit though. Whole thing is pretty complex regardless of uuid, if you have a highly interconnected data model that needs to stay online while migrating.
Comment · 1 year ago
Really beautiful. I bet Ramanujan just “saw” and felt these.
Comment · 1 year ago
That doesn't make sense. The free part is the marketing, the more people like it, the faster it spreads. I run a freemium business and all the motivation internally is to increase growth by improving the free product. Once you achieve a good conversion to pro, any more will slow down growth. At that point, all you care about is improving the product for free users to generate word of mouth, and building features that will do so.
Comment · 1 year ago
I absolutely love this.
Comment · 1 year ago
I have had a few epic refactoring failures with Gemini relative to Claude.

For example: I asked both to change a bunch of code into functions to pass into a `pipe` type function, and Gemini truly seemed to have no idea what it was supposed to do, and Claude just did it.

Maybe there was some user error or something, but after that I haven’t really used Gemini.

I’m curious if people are using Gemini and loving it are using it mostly for one-shotting, or if they’re working with it more closely like a pair programmer? I could buy that it could maybe be good at one but bad at the other?

Comment · 2 years ago
Yeah, it's a good point, but I think that our intuitions are different on this one. I don't have a horse in this race, but my assumption is that the next OpenAI release will be a massive leap, that makes GPT 4/Claude 3 Opus look like toys. Perhaps you're right though, and Anthropic's curves with bend upward even more quickly, so that they get to that they'll start catching up more quickly, until eventually be they're ahead.
Comment · 2 years ago
Two things interest me about Claude being better than GPT-4:

1) We are all breathless that it is better. But a year has passed since GPT4. It’s like we’re excited that someone beat Usain Bolt’s 100 meter time from when he was 7. Impressive, but … he’s twenty now, has been training like a maniac, and we’ll see what happens when he runs his next race.

2) It’s shown AI chat products have no switching costs right now. I now use mostly Claude and pay them money. Each chat is a universe that starts from scratch, so … very easy to switch. Curious if deeper integrations with my data, or real chat memory, will change that.

Comment · 3 years ago
Thanks!
Comment · 3 years ago
Ummmm ... what is grub? Didn't see any links to it from the three random grub2 repos I looked at.
Comment · 3 years ago
"The Art of Action" It has changed how I approach everything, not just how I run my business. Is applying approaches used in militaries to organize action around the leader's intent, taking action in the right general direction, and delegating the "what" (the intent) but not the "how" of the way it is actually achieved.
Comment · 4 years ago
True! I meant "artificial scarcity" in the economic sense of monopolies reduce supply of an abundant material to drive up prices.
Comment · 4 years ago
My best friend's dad was high up in Woodstock 99 corporate, which means he was responsible for making much of it run (yeah, I guess there were some issues ). We had backstage passes, a house, and a ... weird experience. Did some stupid things. Some highlights:

- We were on stage in the famous closing Red Hot Chili Peppers show (like in the wings, looking out on the audience from behind the band). That was surreal. We could see the fires start in the distance, stuff getting ripped down, things starting to sort of go to hell. All while, the most amazing band of the moment is playing the most amazing songs 30 feet away from us. Quite a contrast between awesomeness and ... whatever the strange mix of emotions riots give.

- We learned that there was no Mountain Dew in the whole event because Coke got the contract, so we went out and bought many cases, drove it in through our special entrance, and basically auctioned it off. People were willing to pay $5 a can. We made a lot of money. Pretty sketchy.

- Worse/weirder, we had a backpacks full of ice to hold the Mountain Dew in while we walked around the crowd selling it, and people started to offer to buy ice from us to cool off. So once we ran out of Mountain Dew, we started yelling "Ice is nice! We got ice!" and selling it. That ... well, I feel like that was me experiencing a real microcosm of capitalism and the allure of artificial scarcity ... and not acting the way I would hope . Give away the damn ice man.

- We kind of just walked around backstage and there were so many super famous people that none of them felt very special, and they'd just kind of talk to you while you were in line for food. Ice Cube had some cool sneakers that my friend chatted with him about. George Clinton was chill. I think we talked with Erykah Badu for a while at some point. (Stars are not at all like this backstage at a normal concert, btw, which we also did a lot because of his father. A their normal concerts, these same performers are the center of the universe, and don't have time to chat with a bunch of high schoolers running around.)

Anyway, it was a very strange event, and we had a very strange vantage point.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton