jddj
Joined 8 years ago
Karma
2,843
Submissions
1,092
Member since
Oct 10
Joined 8 years ago
If you get more than before, the punishment might make some sense in a deterministic world so reinstate it.
On whether it's probable, I'd lean towards no but I'm not qualified. The certainty that I read in the parent comment was mainly what I was pushing back against. On a re-read though it's much less certain (either edited or perhaps I massively misinterpreted it the first time around). Runaway implies positive feedback which is hard to gauge, was all I intended to say
It probably shouldn't be, especially for university domains. But here we are.
"Stick in the mud", "Wallflower", those sorts of thing.
Lula may well be guilty of corruption, but Bolsonaro (senior) isn't in it for wider Brazil either. I'm not trying to preach disillusionment, but in 2026 in most of the heavily polarised countries, if we start from a position that they are both acting in pure unadulterated self-interest we'll at least not have blinkers on with respect to the saviour fascist "says what everyone is thinking" strongman, or the current polished establishment status quo spokesman, etc.