jdcarr
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
To pass such a law would require 60 votes in the senate AIUI. Given that this has been a massive part of the republican platform there’s no way ten senators would flip in the current senate.
It could have been passed in the Obama years but I wonder if the public would have had the appetite for it with the assumption that Roe vs Wade would have remained. Let sleeping dogs lie and all that
What this shows to me is the intentional inability for the senate to pass anything but the least offensive bipartisan bills and force other institutions such as the courts to intervene. However as we’ve seen the courts have their own agenda too
def order_list_by_predicate(l, &blk)
l.partition{|i| blk.call(i)}.flatten
end
part(1..6) do |i|
i % 2 == 1
end
And you can always sort the incoming list if that's a requirement.> Event will be cancelled if hazardous weather conditions are predicted.
They're unbelievably capital intensive and have a mean construction time of 7.5 years [0]. I'm from the UK so it's easy to point to Hinkley Point C as an example of this. It's been in planning for a decade and certainly won't be in operation for a similar amount of time, and the currently proposed strike price is around £90/MWh, compared to the ~£60/MWh we've seen from offshore wind projects. Let alone mentioning those have the advantage of being independently deployable with how developers can generate income on a per-turbine basis rather than waiting for the entire farm to be constructed.
And while nuclear is certainly much less CO2 intensive than any fossil-fuel source even a pro-nuclear body's publication shows that wind produces approximately as much CO2/GWh over an installations lifetime as nuclear does [1].
[0] http://euanmearns.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-nucle... [1] http://www.world-nuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/WNA/Publicati... section 4
If anyone's used PostGIS with a similar level of traffic/latency requirements could you comment on your experience?
At the ~51:26 mark of the episode http://www.wnyc.org/radio/#/747788 there's a great description of what the explosion of a hydrogen bomb was like.
Has the nice advantages of keeping your car cool in the summer and removing another piece of complexity in your car.
You could also set up the charge stations such that they either draw from the solar panels or from an alternate power source in the winter when there isn't enough sun to keep a really simple solution.
And I don't see how you can wave away the incident just by claiming the actions were justified because of aviation law or how United runs.