jclos

Yes I expressed myself badly. I meant risk mitigation plan. Usually in grant proposals we are asked to identify what are the major risks (in terms of incidence x impact) for each work package and produce a mitigation plan in case it happens.

This is very cool, but I feel like I should tell you from a marketing perspective that in French "etron" means turd.

This looks interesting, and like it could fill a gap for the planning of research grants. Any chance it could integrate task-level risk management plan, and export as a Gantt chart?

More like CICO, but make sure to eat high satiety carbs, a variety of vegetables, a lot of protein, enough good fats, and have a way to estimate your overall activity level and keep it constant or even slightly higher than usual (e.g. a step counter) to account for NEAT decrease.

The core issue of CICO as you pointed out is that it's a truism that ignores key aspects of a diet that usually come with a restriction in caloric intake - hunger can lead to poor food choices (decrease in TEF) and leads to lethargy (decrease in NEAT) which can account for up to 500 kcal/day (don't quote me on this, just trying to remember the papers I had read a long time ago) and completely negate the dieting effort. That's not even accounting the approximations of CI.

Anything that states that an entire macronutrient is more satiating than another macronutrient is crank science and you should dismiss it. High fibre "carbs" for example are incredibly satiating.

One person's dread will be another's business opportunity - is there any good search engine/recommender system for podcasts?

A few things that come to mind from having worked in many coffees in a few countries where those were implemented would be to institute an off-peak/peak time policy where people are asked not to work during peak time (e.g. lunch), have some sort of subscription model which comes with a faster wifi and X drinks a month.

It looks very nice. Only thing I am worried about is how you plan to make it sustainable. I don't fancy spending time filling a profile for everything to disappear in a few months.

Mostly about generating explanations for the classification/tagging

That's fantastic. I was about to start a project in October building something that's almost completely there already, for a specific use case (annotation of therapy sessions).

I wish my university had something like this for internal use (student projects, research).

Not to mention some higher percentage threshold have been floated around as necessary for some of the more contagious variants of the virus.

> if you ask normal people, they will hate this - only some data fanatics want this feature.

Show the evidence. Wanting data privacy is far from the fringe minority sentiment you imply it to be, otherwise GDPR wouldn't be so popular.

"Astrology for nerds" is one way of describing it that I always liked even though I don't know who is the original author of the expression (if there even is one).