jchmbrln

What would be the explanation for an int taking 28 bytes but a list of 1000 ints taking only 7.87KB?

This is insightful. I remember thinking after the first generation of SPA frameworks like Backbone and Ember and—somewhat later—AngularJS that maybe the second generation (React, Vue, etc.) would get it all sorted out and we'd arrive at stability and consensus. But that hasn't happened. The next generation was better in some ways, worse in a few, and still not quite right in many others.

Of course I hear plenty of people complaining that apps on top of hypertext is a fundamental mistake and so we can't expect it to ever really work, but the way you put it really made it click for me. The problem isn't that we haven't solved the puzzle, it's that the pieces don't actually fit together. Thank you.

I’m completely out of the loop. What’s going on with Spring Boot?

> An even more significant improvement would be electrified trains, which can accelerate roughly twice as fast as those with diesel power...

Can someone comment on why this is? My understanding is that the existing diesel trains use diesel generators to power electric motors.

My questions are: 1) Does "electrified" mean pulling power from a third rail? 2) Whatever it means, what makes "electrified" twice as fast as diesel-electric?

I can see the value of examples, but in this case I appreciate the post largely for its universality and lack of examples. On reading it, examples from past and present experience spring immediately to mind, and I'm tucking this away as a succinct description of the problem. Maybe I can share it with others when more concrete examples come up in future code review.

A principle takes skill the apply, but it's still worth stating and pondering.

> In other words it’s easy to make a difference as a high performer in a low performance organization.

And yet, the big takeaway for me is that to be a high performer it isn’t enough to A) know what needs to be done, or B) be able to do it well. The key is C) figuring out the incentive landscape.

His story of carving out his own job only to find he had no support from the board is what I’ve tried before. In my low performing organization, I thought I could be a high performer by knowing what needed to be done and doing it well. Everybody I directly worked with loved me and thought I was highly effective, but I never made any lasting change like this author. I didn’t understand the need to skip way up the levels until I was already burnt out.

From the article:

> The WolfsBane Hider rootkit hooks many basic standard C library functions such as open, stat, readdir, and access. While these hooked functions invoke the original ones, they filter out any results related to the WolfsBane malware.

I took this to mean some things like a simple “ls -a” might now leave out those suspicious results.

This was my first thought on seeing the title as well. My entire life I and every family member I can think of has used plastic grocery bags for our little bathroom trash cans. I don’t even know what the options are for “real” bags of that size, having never shopped for them. Time to learn, I guess.

That said, this could still reduce my plastic use. The old, thin bags were sufficient. The new, thick bags have been overkill since day one. Given that the frequency with which I take out the trash didn’t change when the thin bags were banned, I’m sure I use quite a bit more plastic than before the ban. Maybe bags sold for small trash cans are thinner, and I’ll go back to pre-ban levels of use.

Yes! When I started using Kate on Linux ca. 2005, I was coming from Notepad on Windows and couldn’t believe how nice it was. I believe it was my first experience of syntax highlighting.

And Amarok! I haven’t thought of that in a while. Losing Amarok was my single biggest regret when I became a Max user. I’ve not used anything since that came close.

I'd love to see your macros if you have them online somewhere. I've lately started spending lots of time notating music in LilyPond and am seeing the need to build tooling along the way.

I started a personal folk song collection using ABC notation. For simple tunes ABC is fantastic, but now that I'm doing more choral/four-part works, I'm reaching for the more powerful tool. Yet there seems to be a huge gap between ABC (simple things done simply and in one way) and LilyPond (do literally anything you want following any format you want, dropping into Scheme as necessary). Ease-of-use/quality-of-life tooling to fill that gap is appealing.

P.S. I'd also love to hear the story of your music publishing venture. It sounds intriguing!