jcfhchcjxhx

nice try mr Microsoft lawyer.

he smartly follows the line you quoted out of context with "and even that they didn't deliver" or something.

so, no contract, an email agreement which was never fullfilled.

man, be happy this guys is a spineless hippie or you would be working overtime and still paying a deal.

brazil, india, angola, china... they are all pushing a central bank owned database for even informal transactions... all the way down to buying candy at a red ligth.

no fees and instant payments are the carot (and then they add daily limits when criminals start to kidnap people to transfer money). But the end game is a stasis wetdream of state control over citzen relations.

you are drinking too much of their marketing.

Not a single wifi consumer vendor have any say on those features. it is one hundred percent done on the closed OS in the radio chip.

your expensive ubiquiti/oanda/cisco have the same mimo/beanforming performance as any opensource/clone using the same wifi radio chipset.

the consumer facing OS just flip a bit somewhere in the configuration flash. granted, knowledge of the right bit to flip mighty be missing on the opensource still, but there's no magic happening in ubiquity owned code.

uniquity is extra shaddy as they buy off the shelf components but demand custom labeling to look like it's their custom silicon. it's not. uniquity is the matress store of wifi.