jbssm
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
I know it looks a bit crazy now, but so did free universal healthcare 40 years ago if you think about it.
Depending in the leverage they used for betting against the HKD these people might be at a serious risk of loosing everything they put there in case the trend doesn't suddenly change or if they don't get enough money from other sources to hold their leverage.
I really like editing in VIM but I moved to Emacs using Spacemacs to try and get the best of both worlds (org mode for scientific research seems a really cool approach).
Still I see Emacs as being quite more bug prone than VIM and VIM than NeoVIm.
Perhaps this is what's needed for someone to start a complete refactor of Emacs and bring it (I mean the code not the editor) to the modern age.
Since non Muslims in France have a natality rate of 1.70 per woman (in fact it's lower you can see why in the link) and Muslim a rate of 3 . And since there is a 0.1% of total French population yearly migration from muslim countries into France.
60 years into the future with generations of 20 years each and NOT increasing the number of yearly migrants you have:
Non Muslim: 65 x (1.7/2)^4 = 34 million
Muslim: (((5 x 3/2+(20 x 67/1000)) x 3/2+(20 x 67/1000)) x 3/2+(20 x 67/1000)) x 3/2 = 35 million
This, not counting the new increase you are having due to the extreme increase in migration this last year.
Many dictators got to power with free elections if you care to look at history.
Before that we practically didn't had caries (just like wild animals also don't).
Throughout human history humans would have the full set of teeth in the vast majority of cases, until we started settling and switched from hunter-gatherer to agricultural society (which is a very recent time in human species development).
These teeth exist for a reason, and mine - luckily - were developed in a perfectly straight way in line with the rest of my teeth. Suggesting to remove them seems just ridiculous to me and a greedy way for the dentist to make some hundreds of euros extra by butchering me off.
What was the excuse in the early days of bitcoin then when the difficulty was orders of magnitude lower?
Difficulty is ever increasing just because of the financial model bitcoin tries to propagate. The author of bitcoin wanted to make it deflational and so it had to be this way.
That part has nothing to do with the integrity of the blockchain and you are mixing two concepts here: Blockchain, which was a great invention and bitcoin, a financial experience (nothing against experiences from my part) which turned out to be a waste of resources.