jazoom

That actually sounds pessimistic to me. My ROI for 18kW solar plus 42kWh battery will be under 3 years.

- Expensive electricity

- Government subsidy for solar and battery

- Much sunshine

- 3 hours free charging daily

Nearly $5000 yearly bill gone. $14000 installation cost post rebate.

I haven't found Kimi to be all that good, but GLM 5.1 I find to be better than Opus 4.6 most of the time in web dev. Opus' only advantage is it's a bit faster. If you can't access GLM 5.1 (not fully released yet) try 5.0. It was better than Opus sometimes too.

I have a GLM Code subscription and it lasts much longer than Claude Code.

I use Pi agent so I use all agents in the same harness.

I just type "z p" in that case and that's enough to get me there.

There would be quite the difference in our patient demographics.

I have quite a few patients from the UK who have had several skin cancers. Invariably they went on holidays to Italy or Spain as a child and soaked up the sun.

Keep up the great work.

> most skin cancers are very obvious even to a non-expert and the reason they are missed are that patients are not checking their skin or have no idea what to look for

I am a skin cancer doctor in Queensland and all I do is find and remove skin cancers (find between 10 and 30 every day). In my experience the vast majority of cancers I find are not obvious to other doctors (not even seen by them), let alone obvious to the patient. Most of what I find are BCCs, which are usually very subtle when they are small. Even when I point them out to the patient they still can't see them.

Also, almost all melanomas I find were not noticed by the patient and they're usually a little surprised about the one I point to.

In my experience the only skin cancers routinely noticed by patients are SCCs and Merkel cell carcinomas.

With respect, if "most skin cancers are very obvious even to a non-expert" I suggest the experts are missing them and letting them get larger than necessary.

I realise things will be different in other parts of the world and my location allows a lot more practice than most doctors would get.

Update: I like the quiz. Nice work! In case anyone is wondering, I only got 27/30. Distinguishing between naevus and melanoma without a dermatoscope on it is sometimes impossible. Get your skin checked.

DistroSea is amazing. I just tried it and it worked well. Though huge latency for me.

It's not satire. Gemini is much better for coding, at least for me.

Just to illustrate, I asked both about a browser automation script this morning. Claude used Selenium. Gemini used Playwright.

I think the main reasons Gemini is much better are:

1. It gets my whole code base as context. Claude can't take that many tokens. I also include documentation for newer versions of libraries (e.g. Svelte 5) that the LLM is not so familiar with.

2. Gemini has a more recent knowledge cutoff.

3. Gemini 2.5 Pro is a thinking model.

4. It's free to use through the web UI.

You don't need to apologise. You created something cool and my family enjoyed playing it.

Looks like I also have to play "guess the timezone of the creator of this game".

I enjoyed playing it yesterday. It's now 11am today and it's still not open again. I have no idea when it will be.

Alpine CSP version works fine. You just can't write JS code in strings, which one may wish to avoid anyway.

I also didn't have a problem with CSP and HTMX.

Nor with SvelteKit.

I'm not sure why you think these are all equivalent to DataStar's hard requirement on unsafe-eval.

FYI, this is the reason I didn't try out DataStar.

I disagree. Doctors can't be expected to be available 100% of the time. The only doctor to see this patient's result was the pathologist (or should have been before being sent off to the requesting doctor). It had not yet been handed over to the requesting doctor in a fail-proof manner.

The pathology company I send my samples to contacts my clinic to ensure we received urgent results. This it's important because there's no guarantee the message ever arrived in the doctor's inbox. If you work in tech you should know this to be the case.

The only way to ensure timeliness is for the pathology company to contact the patient directly if they can't verbally hand over to the requesting doctor.

I would assume he would use HTMX, being the creator of it.

Can you please link me to the source for this? I'm a GP and I've always found this a bit strange.