jatins

I was genuinely asking because I think all harnesses are largely replaceable. They all are building the same thing.

I have used cc, oc, pi, shelley and codex fwiw

say more, what do you think CC does better?

Honestly the fact that LLMs can get 60% at this that most humans will get 0% is commendable for LLMs

Are you checking on desktop? On phone Argon one is completely broken

Yes, sometimes I wonder if the right interface was actually something like Github Pilot’s inline code completions rather than agentic loop.

But if your coworker is shipping 5x more PRs than you your manager couldn’t care less about understanding code

For open source projects which are free of high growth expectations that come with VC funding this might be the right move.

AI coding comes with the tradeoff that you lose understanding of your own code. That is an acceptable tradeoff when getting it out to users matters more than understanding code. But free of capitalistic pressures, why would you accept AI slop?

Replit is not acquired by Anthropic

If anything he is very pro-AI and far from a naysayer. Labelling anyone who doesn't isn't Linkedin style "stoked" "excited" about AI is not helpful.

This is a technology not like prior technologies. Are we okay if the technology discourages a whole generation of Mathematicians? If the technology leads to 10x fewer mathematicians -- what impact does that have on the field? These are the questions Tao is asking. And I don't think he himself claims to have all the answers, he just doesn't wanna see the math _community_ die.

flagged for being low value add slop

Congrats on this ship, it's hard to get anything out there!

However, as many other comments have mentioned -- how do you plan to get users in a crowded space?

Probably the most underwhelming feature of Chatgpt. I dont know why its so slow and overall terrible as compared to Claude artifacts

> superior approach

superior how -- What does it do better over Go channels in your opinion?

> We’ve made major improvements to the way Opus 5.5 writes and communicates, one of the most common areas of feedback we heard about Opus 5. Its messages are much easier to understand at a glance, which testers said helped during long working sessions.

Thank you.