jasaldivara

I don't want to be a gatekeeper, but Clojure, Janet and similars doesn't even have cons cells; that's hardly 'the same programming language'.

Whats wrong about Github pages?

Not just Tailwind; most of the listed criticism are still valid and relevant, even after those products had success.

I don understand: If there are so many developers willing to contribute with non OCaml languages, why they don't just implement their own mod installer in Perl, Java, PHP or whatever a "sane" language is?

I don't get what's miserable or unhappy about criticizing the political incoherence of some people. You may disagree with them, but why the personal attacks?

If you won't say who is the person you're talking about, can you at least tell an example of that cringe behavior?

I think if people want a more powerful, programmable config language, maybe they should use something like Lua or Scheme instead of reinventing the wheel with those new niche languages.

For correctly obeying the rules, you first need to understand and interpret them.

Any scientific source on that "well accepted fact"?

I don't think they are saying "proprietary" as in "secret, closed source", but just as in "custom format" that is built around one particular application.

I assume those scripts are edited on a regular desktop/laptop computer and then uploaded to the phone

> I do not know what the next-best single-user, single-process, non-bloated OS would be to run on modern hardware that still has some reasonably modern software and can be used for distraction-free (hobby) development the way FreeDOS could.

Not sure why would you want a single-process OS on modern hardware, but there are some alternatives that run much less things on the background than regular Linux: Haiku, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, or some lightweight non-glibc, non-systemd Linux-based like Adelie or Alpine.