janfoeh

Of course there were plenty, but now we can produce such codebases at unprecedented speed.

"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequila." — Mitch Ratcliffe

Yes, a "Full Self Driving" system which is not fully self-driving is certainly an improvement over an autopilot that does not auto-pilot. Ain't progress grand.

That is an absolute _hogwash_ of an explanation, and it comes up every single time this discussion is had.

We are talking about cars, not planes. Driven by regular people, not pilots.

It's a term chosen specifically to evoke a certain connotation among the majority of people, and you know it.

> Regulated fields - another clueless poster lol

Out of sheer, idle curiosity: were you actually laughing when you typed that out?

Exactly. Everything below L4 is _incredibly stressful_ and unpleasant to drive, because you have to be constantly aware and alert without having anything to do.

In the case of Tesla, daring to call such a system "Autopilot" is a breathtaking level of irresponsibility. You are responsible for the vehicle you are driving, practically, morally and legally, even if a companies' marketing and the system itself does its very best to divest you from that simple and obvious truth.

This user turned off the installation of system updates, because Apple labelled a control incorrectly.

Which is not apparent if you give them an explicitly labelled separate toggle.

He had enabled a setting that says "Install [...] security updates". If enabling that setting does not lead to the system installing security updates, that's on Apple.

Once upon a time, 1password (macOS pwd manager) vault files could be opened standalone in a browser, which was extremely nifty.

I am doing nothing of the sort; you're shadow-boxing, and nothing you wrote has any bearing on the point under discussion here: a privacy-sensitive feature that the user explicitly disabled was silently re-enabled and the toggle removed.

Do you believe that adding a "no" button _and then honoring it when the user clicked on it_ requires developing a separate version of their system?

Regardless: they already did, because Apple intelligence is not available in the EU.

Yes, how quixotic of them. They really should have foreseen this when they published the license … checks notes … close to twenty years ago.

The "Hardware & Environment" part which supposedly links me across different browsers doesn't work — it differs between Safari, Firefox and Chromium.

In a private Safari window, it's not even stable across reloads.