james1071
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
In contrast, several newspapers have reported information which revealed the identity of one or more accusers, but were not prosecuted.
His approach was never going to work, as doctors do not spend their time evaluating drugs in the way that he imagined.
The typical doctor has minimal training in evaluating medicines - that is not their job.
They defer to so-called opinion-leaders, who are the experts on particular diseases.
These people are the targets of drug companies' marketing - think scientific conferences in 5 star hotels in exotic locations.
The cost of influencing them would be millions.
So,the author was barking up the wrong tree.
That's not to say that he didn't have something, but had no idea how to market it.
If not, then it will be a case of bad rules allowing a bad product to have been used.
This is the best description of what it was all about from the persepctive of Craig Murray.