jambutters

Why not use max thinking for implementation? For cost reasons?

Ahh. I recall their opencode go plan offered $60-$80 worth of Deepseek for $5-10 or something? I was debating if I should try it out but I think this is convincing me not to...Thanks for the heads up

The tech of the rust language is real though and is providing real world value

Eh, it's the phrasing that's off-putting. Things that can be self hosted usually emphasize that first and top most, with a paid option being mentioned 2nd.

So you prefer scripting in deno/JavaScript over python?

I don't think it loses the spotlight more so that it's just node is just good enough and the cost to switch and learn something new as too high

What makes you rank Hermes higher than openclaw?

So if money isn't a problem, opus is the best?

Insane!

Nah, they wouldn't have released deepseek open source if they were the case

They'd be running in the red then cause they charge way less than Claude. Sorry but it just doesn't make logical sense. They have open source, papers, and self hosting too

Honestly a unique searchable name is better. I type in racket and results are mixed with tennis and I need to suffix "Language"

What? I know what you're taking about but it's literally only 1 dude(Matthias vs Butterick) who has chilled down for the most part Everyone else is fine. Do you have the source for others being toxic?

I think this is one of the few cases where there isn't a grift. It's open source, open research, there's not much to hide? Honestly official statements are pretty tame, it's the people who spin them for media headline clicks that are warping reality

Where does it say it will train on private? This seems like a security nightmare if it trains on hardcoded keys