jamala1

Why don't they lobby against it altogether if the don't like being responsible?

I like Xfce with Chicago95.

Arxiv is mostly meant for preprints for peer review.

In a Nature paper in particular, the final layout is typically done by the journal's professional production team, not the authors.

Not all publishers grant permission for authors to upload the peer-reviewed and layouted postprints elsewhere.

Probably still better than the non-technical people usually governing things.

Very neat and creative approach but I'm honestly conflicted whether the country/map metaphor is the best choice. In many cases the names are not that clear, so one has to zoom in to understand what they represent. It would perhaps be more interesting to do hierarchical clustering and show something like average connectiveness between the (super)clusters with lines, possibly with more descriptive/faithful LLM-generated labels for each cluster.

I guess it's the difference between an ensemble and a mixture of experts, i.e. aggregating outputs from (a) model(s) trained on the same data vs different data (GPT-4). Though GPT-4 presumably does not aggregate, but it routes.

Is the joke removing the "ant" prefix?

Do you really need to be certified if you only use it for receiving?

Having used Copilot for a year now I very much doubt this figure. In my experience it only works well in boilerplate kind of situations where most code is copy/paste work anyhow. As soon as the code gets a little complicated it stops working well. It has also gotten quite slow for me lately. So I doubt it increases my work efficiency by more than 5%, but I do like it for reducing strain on the hands. For that I find the price appropriate.

Is Paperless suitable for business use, say, for a smallish sized company with 25 employees and 1000 customers. I think in my EU country such systems need to fulfill certain requirements like versioning/tracking of changes.