jacques_chester
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
Funny how little has changed except the names, I guess.
I take it vito talked you into adopting Garden? </injoke>
In a shocking twist, the prompter works in VC.
I am ashamed I worked there.
1. You smash out rubbish as quickly as you can.
2. You get credit for "shipping" and "moving fast".
3. It is later learned by management that the rubbish is rubbish. But crucially, they do not view bugs as arising from how the work was done. Rather, it is treated as if it is an uncontrollable natural process.
4. Fixing high-profile rubbish is prioritized.
5. The rubbish is smothered with still more rubbish that moves the observable rubbishness to elsewhere in the codebase.
6. You get credit for "better engineering" and "moving fast".
Nobody is properly incentivized to prevent rubbish. Only to produce it and then to produce more of it.
Sometimes it's nice to be able to just bang out some code without looking everything up. IDEs in an IDE-friendly language make this awareness accessible in the immediate frame, but don't necessarily help with having a mental menu of possibilities to choose from.
That said: I find spaced repetition utterly crushing, so I only use it very sparingly.
It's what management rewards.
And really, ranges are an amazing substrate for this. I've had to do this by hand in a ... less featuresome ... SQL-speaking DB and it was clunky and performed fairly unimpressively.
I am frequently wrong. I hope you will not spare my feelings when I am.
For my CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jacqueschester/
For personal email: [email protected]