jackson1way
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Wanna heat up a cup of milk from the fridge? 70sec. Only half a cup? 40sec. Wife wants the milk extra hot? 80sec. Milk wasn't in the fridge? Minus 10-20sec - and so on. For families it's really useful.
It's 4 years old now and used 10 times a days, and runs still fine. It's a bit loud and the glass is very dark so you can't peek inside (probably the biggest disadvantage).
Not too exciting. They also have chocolate and strawberry drinks :-)
I have been looking for lossless (reencode-less) trimming of videos since the end of 90s and always just found huge video editing tools that never had these features. And then ypu were stuck with some CLI tools where you need to count the number of frames or milliseconds or something like that. Like if a WYSIWYG tool isn‘t what most people would want to use.
How does the native iOS photo editing tool handle video trimming? And photo cropping? iMovie? And what about google android tools? Or popular Windows tools?
I used to crop my photos with XnView, which supports lossless cropping. And I‘m always puzzled this hasn‘t really take off in other popular tools.
Lossless crop of photos and lossless trim of videos should always be included as a feature.
Reencoding sucks.
That‘s about the time I switched to laser printers. Currently I equipped myself and my family with a Brother HL 3152CDW. I got it for around 160-180€. The included toners print 1-2k pages. A new toner does 2-2,5k and costs around 60€ per color (genuine Brother) or around 50-60€ for a 4-color-toner set from noname brands. We have the printer since maybe 3-4 years and had to buy 1 black toner. I think I got a noname cartridge for around 25€.
If you want a smaller device and save a little money, get a b/w laser printer for less than 100€.
If I need to print photos, I go to a store with instant printing kiosks. It takes a few minutes to print dozens of photos and it‘s cheap, around 0,20-0,30€ per print (10x15cm).
I hope laser printers will never become such a scam product like inkjet...
Even 4 digits could be enough, given that iOS enforces (very long) delays after a few failed attempts.
But really, I want to know why the software and hardware of the aircraft fails to understand that whatever actions it has performed automatically or inputs/actions by the pilots, or any other important event, are making the damn aircraft loose altitude really really fast. In the case of these Boeings, how can your software keep pointing the nose of the aircraft down WHILE it is CONSISTENTLY loosing altitude? How is this not a huge design flaw? I understand that for stall recovery you actually have to loose some altitude to regain speed/lift and recover from the stall. But if you STILL KEEP loosing altitude and there is no turning point, then damnit, whatever caused the loosing altitude should be stopped at least at 500m AGL, no? Switch on a huge yellow light to the pilots „you are 100% on your own now, the computer is out of luck and is shutting down“ and the pilot jumps on the gas pedal, 200% power to the engines, and starts to figure out how to gain altitude. Both Boeing flights were in daylight, no? Pilots should be able to see the ground/water and be able to pull the thing back up just by visibility without any sensors? It‘s a bit of a different case with the AF447, though.
How did the AoA sensors and MCAS won the authority here over the only important data: altitude change. Who cares if the AoA shows 30 degrees or -271 degrees, as long as the plane is climbing we are good! No need to point the nose down or do any other stall protection stuff? And that seems to be really what happened with these 2 Boeings. They were climbing but some stupid AoA sensor failed and some even more stupid MCAS decided to dive. And they kept diving until they reached the ocean and MCAS was still confident it was a good idea to dive?
In some planes my iPhone is able to get the GPS reading and some free app I got 5 years ago will actually show me ground speed and altitude. Which I always find very exciting. It usually matches with what the entertainment system is showing on the pax screens. Give or take <1%. So reliable altitude reading is solved, no? You have 300 phones on your plane (though only the window seats have a chance for it to work, but still...). Not sure if the GPS is gonna work if the plane is rolling and spinning like crazy, which I dont think happened in any of these cases.
I hope I don‘t make it sound stupid or even i-know-it-better, but I really just want to understand.