jackphilson

Yeah, AI seems like a good shift in "narrative making." It's easy to ask AI "give me an efficient way to "confirm or deny this narrative" and have something like this go viral. This is good because it makes narratives more truthful

One requires you to trust a human and the other requires you to trust mathematics.

But who is getting celebrated? The people who spent a lot of time on the original thing, or the AI rewrite that everyone now uses?

It's pretty ergonomic to agents. Like typescript.

It's the old game that he's trying to preserve. It's time to move on to the new game. When the landscape shifts beneath you, its very low probability that the existing structures on the landscape are a good fit for the new landscape, and the structures on the new landscape must be rethought from first principles.

because the social media sites that do will outcompete once people get personal AI coaches that tell them to use technology that is better for them.

School should be this, but applied to literally everything. Ideally with AI generating it all.

What is your take on the optimal usage of AI, and why would it not be N + 1? I think the article is largely correct here.

Interesting example on how I envision software to evolve in the future because massive abundance caused by AI. Massively composable and interoperable.

Triangle kind of reminds me of the Bermuda Triangle. You know how many people died there?

not derailing, just pointing out effective ways of producing good which is what i was responding to. i think its good for people to be aware of this. those people are all examples of people who have influenced culture for bad. you can do it for good: bryan johnson, civil rights leaders, leftist streamers. andrew tate was just the most effective, recent, and obvious one which is why I pointed him out.

I mean just an example. He obviously wasn't the most ethical person. Depends how you do it

Regulations can often be bad for progress so a CBA is probably best. Doesn't matter about the framing.